Vol. 61, Issue 4, 2009September 01, 2009 EDT
Shedding (False) Light: How the Florida Supreme Court’s Rejection of the Tort Falsely Implies Protection for Media Defendants
Shedding (False) Light: How the Florida Supreme Court’s Rejection of the Tort Falsely Implies Protection for Media Defendants
Kristen Rasmussen,
Articles in Vol. 61, Issue 4, 2009
Vol. 61, Issue 4, 2009
- Introduction to the Symposium on the Model Penal Code's Sentencing ProposalsChristopher Slobigin
- Demographic Impact Statements, O'Connor's Warning, and the Mysteries of Prison Release: Topics from a Sentencing Reform AgendaKevin R. Reitz
- The Enduring (and Again Timely) Wisdom of the Original MPC Sentencing ProvisionsDouglas A. Berman
- How (Not) to Think Like a PunisherAlice Ristroph
- MPC-The Root of the Problem: Just Deserts and Risk AssessmentMichael Marcus
- Good Conduct Time: How Much and for Whom? The Unprincipled Approach of the Model Penal Code: SentencingNora V. Demleitner
- Tragedy, Skepticism, Empirics, and the MPCSRobert Weisberg
- In Defense of Private-Label Mortgage-Backed SecuritiesBrent J. Horton
- Confidential Sources ReconsideredDavid A. Anderson
- Shedding (False) Light: How the Florida Supreme Court’s Rejection of the Tort Falsely Implies Protection for Media DefendantsKristen Rasmussen
- Politics versus Precision: Did the Miami-Dade School Board Violate the First Amendment When it Voted to Remove ¡Vamos a Cuba! from its District Libraries?Lindsay M. Saxe
- Setting The “Persecutor Bar” For Political Asylum After NegusieDavid A. Karp
Kristen Rasmussen, Shedding (False) Light: How the Florida Supreme Court’s Rejection of the Tort Falsely Implies Protection for Media Defendants, 61 Fla. L. Rev. 911 (2009).