Vol. 72, Issue 6, 2020November 01, 2020 EDT
Habeas Mentem: Revisiting Sufficiency-of-Counsel Standards in Post-AEDPA Habeas Corpus Proceedings
Habeas Mentem: Revisiting Sufficiency-of-Counsel Standards in Post-AEDPA Habeas Corpus Proceedings
Alejandra S. Alvarez,
Articles in Vol. 72, Issue 6, 2020
Vol. 72, Issue 6, 2020
- Judicial Resistance to Mandatory Arbitration as Federal CommandeeringMatthew J. StanfordDavid A. Carrillo
- Rescinding Inclusion in the Administrative State: Adjudicating DACA, the Census, and the Military's Transgender PolicyPeter Margulies
- Habeas Mentem: Revisiting Sufficiency-of-Counsel Standards in Post-AEDPA Habeas Corpus ProceedingsAlejandra S. Alvarez
- Taxation Without Immunization: Exercising the Federal Taxing Power to Increase Childhood Vaccination RatesNicholas R. Consalvo
- Allowing the Tree to be Cut Down: Quo Warranto Writs in FloridaJohn W. Wilcox
- An Economic Approach to Religious ExemptionsStephanie Barclay
- Holding Social Media Providers Liable for Acts of Domestic TerrorismChloe Berryman
- Peña-Rodriquez v. Colorado and the Racial Animus Exception to the No-Impeachment Rule: Extending an Exception to Suspect Classes that Experience Pervasive Bias in the Jury SystemTaariq Lewis
- Differentiating Exclusionary TendenciesJohn Infranca
Alejandra S. Alvarez, Habeas Mentem: Revisiting Sufficiency-of-Counsel Standards in Post-AEDPA Habeas Corpus Proceedings, 72 Fla. L. Rev. 1481 (2020).