Vol. 64, Issue 5, 2012September 01, 2012 EDT
The Case Against Appointing Politicians to the Supreme Court
The Case Against Appointing Politicians to the Supreme Court
Brannon P. Denning,
Articles in Vol. 64, Issue 5, 2012
Vol. 64, Issue 5, 2012
- How Florida Accepted Merit Retention: Nothing Succeeds Quite Like a ScandalMartin A. Dyckman
- Merit Retention ElectionsJoseph W. Little
- Judges Are (and Ought to Be) DifferentPeter D. Webster
- Razing the Funhouse?Shubha Ghosh
- What Do America’s First Patents Have to Do With Today’s?Kristen Osenga
- Why History Matters in the Patentable Subject Matter DebateAdam Mossoff
- The Pre-Appointment Experience of Supreme Court JusticesTimothy P. O’Neill
- The Case Against Appointing Politicians to the Supreme CourtBrannon P. Denning
- The Flight From JudgmentJennifer Hendricks
- An Empirical Study of Supreme Court Justice Pre-Appointment ExperienceBenjamin H. Barton
- Triangulating Judicial Responsiveness: Automated Content Analysis, Judicial Opinions, and the Methodology of Legal ScholarshipChad M. OldfatherJoseph P. BockhorstBrian P. Dimmer
- The Gold Clause Cases and Constitutional NecessityGerard N. Magliocca
- America’s First PatentsMichael Risch
- Law of the Intermediated Information ExchangeJacqueline D. Lipton
- Election Law Behind a Veil of IgnoranceChad Flanders
- The Invisibility of Jurisdictional Procedure and Its ConsequencesJustin R. Pidot
- Perspective on Judicial Merit Retention in FloridaScott G. Hawkins
- The New Crowdfunding Registration Exemption: Good Idea, Bad ExecutionStuart R. Cohn
- Surpassing Sentencing: The Controversial Next Step in Confrontation Clause JurisprudenceAmanda Harris
Brannon P. Denning, The Case Against Appointing Politicians to the Supreme Court, 64 Fla. L. Rev. F. 31 (2012).