Articles in Vol. 64, Issue 5, 2012
Vol. 64, Issue 5, 2012
- How Florida Accepted Merit Retention: Nothing Succeeds Quite Like a ScandalMartin A. Dyckman
- Merit Retention ElectionsJoseph W. Little
- Judges Are (and Ought to Be) DifferentPeter D. Webster
- Razing the Funhouse?Shubha Ghosh
- What Do America’s First Patents Have to Do With Today’s?Kristen Osenga
- Why History Matters in the Patentable Subject Matter DebateAdam Mossoff
- The Pre-Appointment Experience of Supreme Court JusticesTimothy P. O’Neill
- The Case Against Appointing Politicians to the Supreme CourtBrannon P. Denning
- The Flight From JudgmentJennifer Hendricks
- An Empirical Study of Supreme Court Justice Pre-Appointment ExperienceBenjamin H. Barton
- Triangulating Judicial Responsiveness: Automated Content Analysis, Judicial Opinions, and the Methodology of Legal ScholarshipChad M. OldfatherJoseph P. BockhorstBrian P. Dimmer
- The Gold Clause Cases and Constitutional NecessityGerard N. Magliocca
- America’s First PatentsMichael Risch
- Law of the Intermediated Information ExchangeJacqueline D. Lipton
- Election Law Behind a Veil of IgnoranceChad Flanders
- The Invisibility of Jurisdictional Procedure and Its ConsequencesJustin R. Pidot
- Perspective on Judicial Merit Retention in FloridaScott G. Hawkins
- The New Crowdfunding Registration Exemption: Good Idea, Bad ExecutionStuart R. Cohn
- Surpassing Sentencing: The Controversial Next Step in Confrontation Clause JurisprudenceAmanda Harris
Joseph W. Little, Merit Retention Elections, 64 Fla. L. Rev. F. 7 (2012).