Vol. 46, Issue 1, 1994January 01, 1994 EDT
Halting Devolution or Bleak to the Future: Subrin’s New-Old Procedure as a Possible Antidote to Dreyfuss’s “Tolstoy Problem”
Halting Devolution or Bleak to the Future: Subrin’s New-Old Procedure as a Possible Antidote to Dreyfuss’s “Tolstoy Problem”
Jeffrey W. Stempel,
Articles in Vol. 46, Issue 1, 1994
Vol. 46, Issue 1, 1994
- Introduction: Symposium on Recent Changes in the Rules of Pretrial Fact Development: What Do They Disclose About Litigation and the Legal Profession?Mary P. Twitchell
- The What and Why of the New Discovery RulesRochelle C. Dreyfuss
- Fudge Points and Thin Ice in Discovery Reform and the Case for Selective Substance-Specific ProcedureStephen N. Subrin
- Halting Devolution or Bleak to the Future: Subrin's New-Old Procedure as a Possible Antidote to Dreyfuss's "Tolstoy Problem"Jeffrey W. Stempel
- The 1994 Annual Meeting of the Association of Law Schools: Changing the Rules of Pretrial Fact DisclosureWilliam O. Bertelsman
- Discovery in the Real WorldMinna J. Kotkin
- The Transmittal Letter TranslatedCarl Tobias
- Florida Corporation Law: Propose Statutory Relief for Oppressed Minority Shareholders in FloridaJeffrey M. McFarland
- Constitutional Law: An End to Privacy in the CurtilageFrank D. Hosely
- Torts: Strict Liability Applied to Commercial Lessors in FloridaDerek Richman
Jeffrey W. Stempel, Halting Devolution or Bleak to the Future: Subrin’s New-Old Procedure as a Possible Antidote to Dreyfuss’s “Tolstoy Problem,” 46 Fla. L. Rev. 57 (1994).