Vol. 44, Issue 3, 1992July 01, 1992 EDT
Court-Ordered Contraception: Norplant as a Probation Condition in Child Abuse
Court-Ordered Contraception: Norplant as a Probation Condition in Child Abuse
James H. Taylor,
Articles in Vol. 44, Issue 3, 1992
Vol. 44, Issue 3, 1992
- Giving, Trading, Theiving, and Trusting: How and Why Gifts Become Exchanges, and (More Importantly) Vice VersaCarol M. Rose
- Differences Between Gifts and Exchange: Comment on Carol M. RoseRobert H. Frank
- Rose and Apple--Original Gifts?Emily Fowler Hartigan
- His to Give, His to Receive, Hers to Trust: A Response to Carol M. RoseMary Louise Fellows
- Do We Believe in Generosity? Refelctions on the Relationship Between Gifts and ExchangesJane B. Baron
- Givng Some Back--A RepriseCarol M. Rose
- Court-Ordered Contraception: Norplant as a Probation Condition in Child AbuseJames H. Taylor
- The Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990: A Congressional Mandate for Heightened Judicial Protection of Disabled PersonsAmy Scott Loundes
- RTC Repudiation of Contracts Under FIRREA: A Broad Power to Achieve Broad Legislative GoalsWendy S. Cousins
- Professional Responsibility: Duties Owed to a Unrepresented PartyWilliam J. Hazzard
James H. Taylor, Court-Ordered Contraception: Norplant as a Probation Condition in Child Abuse, 44 Fla. L. Rev. 379 (1992).