Vol. 68, Issue 5, 2016September 01, 2016 EDT
Gerrymandering (Almost) Gone Wild: How the Supreme Court Saved Independent Redistricting Reform
Gerrymandering (Almost) Gone Wild: How the Supreme Court Saved Independent Redistricting Reform
Michael Woods,
Articles in Vol. 68, Issue 5, 2016
Vol. 68, Issue 5, 2016
- The Centrist Case Against Current (Conservative) Arbitration LawStephen J. Ware
- Lawyers Going Bare and Clients Going BlindLeslie C. Levin
- Penal Welfare and the New Human Trafficking Intervention CourtsAya GruberAmy J. CohenKate Mogulescu
- Does the Telephone Consumer Protection Act Violate Due Process As Applied?J. Gregory Sidak
- Supreme DisgorgementCaprice Roberts
- The Secretary's Emails: The Intersection of Transparency, Security, and TechnologyJoshua Jacobson
- Undue Process: A Father's Proprietary Interest in an Embryo and Its Clash with CaseyAnthony Jose Sirven
- Section 875C: Not for All Intents and PurposesMaris Snell
- Gerrymandering (Almost) Gone Wild: How the Supreme Court Saved Independent Redistricting ReformMichael Woods
Michael Woods, Gerrymandering (Almost) Gone Wild: How the Supreme Court Saved Independent Redistricting Reform, 68 Fla. L. Rev. 1509 (2016).