Vol. 64, Issue 4, 2012July 01, 2012 EDT
Wrong Means to an Unjust End? The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in First Vagabonds Church of God
Wrong Means to an Unjust End? The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in First Vagabonds Church of God
Fay O. Pappas,
Articles in Vol. 64, Issue 4, 2012
Vol. 64, Issue 4, 2012
- Pleading, Discovery, and the Federal Rules: Exploring the Foundation of Modern ProcedureMartin H. Redish
- How to Think About Errors, Costs, and Their AllocationRonald J. Allen
- Twombly in Context: Why Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(B) Is UnconstitutionalE. Donald Elliott
- A Modest Proposal for Human Limitations on CyberdiscoveryRichard Esenberg
- From Trademarks to BrandsDevin R. Resai
- Intellectual Property and Human Rights in the Nonmultilateral EraPeter K. Yu
- Eighteenth Century Law, Twenty-First Century Problems: Jones, GPS Tracking, and the Future of PrivacyLauren Millcarek
- Hurd v. Espinoza: “Third Party Confidential Information” in Delaware Corporate LitigationGiselle Gutierrez
- Wrong Means to an Unjust End? The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in First Vagabonds Church of GodFay O. Pappas
Fay O. Pappas, Wrong Means to an Unjust End? The Eleventh Circuit’s Decision in First Vagabonds Church of God, 64 Fla. L. Rev. 1125 (2012).