Vol. 63, Issue 6, 2011December 01, 2011 EDT
An Open and Shut Case: Why (and How) the Eleventh Circuit Should Restrain the Government’s Forum Closure Power
An Open and Shut Case: Why (and How) the Eleventh Circuit Should Restrain the Government’s Forum Closure Power
Jordan E. Pratt,
Articles in Vol. 63, Issue 6, 2011
Vol. 63, Issue 6, 2011
- The Constitutional Paradox of the Durbin Amendment: How Monopolies Are Offered Constitutional Protections Denied to Competitive FirmsRichard A. Epstein
- Building Better Bailouts: The Case for a Long-Term Investment ApproachJeffrey Manns
- The Overhyped Path from Tinker to Morse: How the Student Speech Cases Show the Limits of Supreme Court Decisions – for the Law and for the LitigantsScott A. Moss
- Some More Watters, Please: The Dodd-Frank Act’s New Preemption Standards Lighten Consumers’ WalletsCourtney Gaughan
- An Open and Shut Case: Why (and How) the Eleventh Circuit Should Restrain the Government’s Forum Closure PowerJordan E. Pratt
- Losing Our Soul: Judicial Discretion in Sentencing Child Pornography OffendersKathryn A. Kimball
- Confirmation of a Catch-22: Glik v. Cunniffe and the Paradox of Citizen RecordingCaycee Hampton
Jordan E. Pratt, An Open and Shut Case: Why (and How) the Eleventh Circuit Should Restrain the Government’s Forum Closure Power, 63 Fla. L. Rev. 1487 (2011).