Vol. 60, Issue 4, 2008September 01, 2008 EDT
Constitutional Advocacy Explains Constitutional Outcomes
Constitutional Advocacy Explains Constitutional Outcomes
Stephen A. Higginson,
Articles in Vol. 60, Issue 4, 2008
Vol. 60, Issue 4, 2008
- Resolving a "Substantial Question": Just Who is Entitled to Bail Pending Appeal under the Bail Reform Act of 1984?Doug Keller
- Constitutional Advocacy Explains Constitutional OutcomesStephen A. Higginson
- The Gunslinger to the Ivory Tower Came: Should Universities Have a Duty to Prevent Rampage Killings?Ben Williamson
- Does a Cartel Aim Expressly? Trusting Calder Personal Jurisdiction when Antitrust Goes Global?Larry Dougherty
- False Statements v. Free Debate: Is the First Amendment a License to Lie in Elections?Simon A. Rodell
- Qualified Immunity: When is a Loss Ultimately a Win?Michael J. Hooi
- Distilling Minimum Due Process Requirements for Punitive Damages AwardsBenjamin J. Robinson
Stephen A. Higginson, Constitutional Advocacy Explains Constitutional Outcomes, 60 Fla. L. Rev. 857 (2008).