Vol. 52, Issue 5, 2000December 01, 2000 EDT
Ignoring Distress Signals: Why Courts Recognize Emotional Distress Damages in Wrongful Adoption Claims
Ignoring Distress Signals: Why Courts Recognize Emotional Distress Damages in Wrongful Adoption Claims
Erica Shultz,
Articles in Vol. 52, Issue 5, 2000
Vol. 52, Issue 5, 2000
- Is Diversity a Value in American Higher Education?Anthony T. Kronman
- Dean Kromans's Diversity Narrative: Liberal Education Ideology versus Social Justice?Winston P. Nagan
- Diversity Is a Value in American Higher Education, But It Is Not a Legal Justification for Affermative ActionE. John Gregory
- Does the Excluded COD Income of an Insolvent S Corporation Increas the Basis of the Shareholders' Stock?James F. Loebl
- Extending Copyright and the Constitution: "Have I Stayed Too Long?"Michael H. Davis
- Pretrial Publicity and Individual Voir Dire: What Has the Florida Supreme Court Done to the Jury Selection Process?Ashley Newsom
- Ignoring Distress Signals: Why Courts Recognize Emotional Distress Damages in Wrongful Adoption ClaimsErica Shultz
Erica Shultz, Ignoring Distress Signals: Why Courts Recognize Emotional Distress Damages in Wrongful Adoption Claims, 52 Fla. L. Rev. 1073 (2000).