This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Fla. L. Rev.
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Articles
    • Book Reviews
    • Case Comments
    • Commentary
    • Essays
    • Florida Law Review Forum
    • Historic Mastheads
    • Notes
    • Symposia Posters
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Florida Law Review Forum
  • Symposia
  • Alumni
  • Prospective Members
  • Recognitions
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • Facebook (opens in a new tab)
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:16054/feed
Case Comments
Vol. 42, Issue 2, 1990April 01, 1990 EDT

Tort Law: Childrent v. Advertisers: TV Torts–Is There a Duty?

Terri Day,
Photo by Thomas Martinsen on Unsplash

Articles in Vol. 42, Issue 2, 1990

Vol. 42, Issue 2, 1990
  • The Cost of Older Workers, Disparate Impact, and the Age Discrimination in Employment Act
    Steven C. Kaminshine
  • Ordinary High Water Line Determination: Legal Issues
    Richard HamannJeff Wade
  • Constitutional Law: Procedural Safeguards Required in First Amendment Prior Restraint Context
    Grace F. Woods
  • Tort Law: Childrent v. Advertisers: TV Torts--Is There a Duty?
    Terri Day
  • Weyrauch: The Narks of Frankfurt
    Detlev F. Vagts
Fla. L. Rev.
Terri Day, Tort Law: Childrent v. Advertisers: TV Torts–Is There a Duty?, 42 Fla. L. Rev. 413 (1990).
Save article as...▾

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system