This website uses cookies

We use cookies to enhance your experience and support COUNTER Metrics for transparent reporting of readership statistics. Cookie data is not sold to third parties or used for marketing purposes.

Skip to main content
null
Fla. L. Rev.
  • Menu
  • Articles
    • Articles
    • Book Reviews
    • Case Comments
    • Commentary
    • Essays
    • Florida Law Review Forum
    • Notes
    • Symposia Posters
    • All
  • For Authors
  • Editorial Board
  • About
  • Issues
  • Blog
  • Florida Law Review Forum
  • Symposia
  • Alumni
  • Prospective Members
  • Recognitions
  • search
  • X (formerly Twitter) (opens in a new tab)
  • Facebook (opens in a new tab)
  • LinkedIn (opens in a new tab)
  • RSS feed (opens a modal with a link to feed)

RSS Feed

Enter the URL below into your favorite RSS reader.

http://localhost:5765/feed
Articles
Vol. 22, Issue 4, 1970May 01, 1970 EDT

Double Jeopardy Problems in the Defintion of the Same Offense: State Discretion to Invoke the Criminal Process Twice

William A. Haddad, David C. Mulock,
Photo by Mikhail Pavstyuk on Unsplash
Fla. L. Rev.
William A. Haddad & David C. Mulock, Double Jeopardy Problems in the Defintion of the Same Offense: State Discretion to Invoke the Criminal Process Twice, 22 Fla. L. Rev. 515 (1970).

View more stats

Powered by Scholastica, the modern academic journal management system