-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: Twombly
Andrew Blair-Stanek, Twombly is the Logical Extension of the Mathew v. Eldridge Test for Discovery
62 Fla. L. Rev. 1 (2010) | | | | ABSTRACT :: The Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly has baffled and mystified both practitioners and scholars, casting aside the well-settled rule for … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Civil Procedure, Jurisprudence, Uncategorized
Tagged attorney practice, Bell Atlantic, Civil Procedure, Complaint, Discovery, Eldridge, Jurisprudence, Matthews, Motion to Dismiss, Stanek, Twombly
Comments Off
Lisa Eichhorn, Sense of Disentitlement: Frame-Shifting and Metaphor in Ashcroft v. Iqbal
62 Fla. L. Rev. 951 (2010) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Judicial opinions analyzing civil procedure issues are unlikely sources of rich imagery. Recent legal scholarship on metaphor has focused on sexier areas of the law, such as constitutional … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Civil Procedure, Contract Law, Uncategorized
Tagged allegations, anxieties, Ashcroft, Bell Atlantic, Civil Procedure, detailed evidence, detailed facts, Discovery, Disentitlement, Eichorn, fears and resentments, Frame-Shifting, Iqbal, litigation process, Motion to Dismiss, plausibility, specificity of pleadings, Twombly
Comments Off