-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: statutory intrepretation
Richard L. Hasen, Bush v. Gore and the Lawlessness Principle: A Comment on Professor Amar
61 Fla. L. Rev. 979 (2009) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Akhil Amar begins his impressive Dunwody Lecture by questioning whether there “are any new things left to say about the Bush-Gore episode.” 1 It is a legitimate question … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Rights Law, Constitutional Law, Election Law, Florida Constitutional Law, Governments and Legislation, Jurisprudence, Uncategorized
Tagged 2008 Senate Election, Article II, Bush, Bush v. Gore, election disputes, election outcomes, Equal protection, Florida Supreme Court, Gore, Hasen, Lawlessness, Minnesota, Professor Amar, Rehnquist, Scalia, statutory intrepretation, Thomas
Comments Off
Michael Nardella, Knowing When to Stop: Is the Punctuation of the Constitution Based on Sound or Sense?
59 Fla. L. Rev. 667 (2007) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Take another look at the Fifth Amendment. Look carefully. If you read it with an eye toward punctuation, you will notice that the Amendment itself is one long … Continue reading
Diana L. Hayes, Bankruptcy Law: An Exercise in Statutory Interpretation-Staying True to the Broad Aim of the Code or Ignoring Plain Meaning and Purpose?
59 Fla. L. Rev. 697 (2007) | | | | TEXT :: State law required Petitioner to maintain workers’ compensation coverage for his freight trucking business. Petitioner contracted with Respondent to provide this insurance. After Petitioner canceled the policy and … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Bankruptcy, Uncategorized, Workers Compensation Law
Tagged 506(a)(5), 506(b), 507(a)(5) Chapter 11, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy Act, Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, Hayes, Oversecured, postpetition interest, priority, Shedd, statute, statutory intrepretation, substitution-type benefits, United States v. Embassy Restaurant
Comments Off