-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: Smith
Alisa Smith & Michael J. Saks, In Honor of Walter O. Weyrauch: The Case for Overturning Williams v. Florida and the Six-Person Jury: History, Law, and Empirical Evidence
60 Fla. L. Rev. 441 (2008) | | | | ABSTRACT :: After 700 years of common-law history and nearly 200 years of constitutional history, the Supreme Court concluded that the constitutionally permissible minimum jury size could not be inferred … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Uncategorized
Tagged Ballew v. Georgia, constitutionally permissible jury, Saks, Six Person Jury, Sixth Amendment history, Smith, traditional size, twelve person jury, Williams v. Florida
Comments Off
Justin Smith, Post-Conviction Relief under Florida Law: The Undue Process of the Evolutionary Refinement
57 Fla. L. Rev. 653 (2005) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: “We might go further and say that even those laws which have been written down are best regarded as not unchangeable.” Aristotle “[T]hey are . . . promulgated … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Florida Constitutional Law, Uncategorized
Tagged ambiguity in the law, attempted burglary, Clyde Timothy Bunkley, disproportionate punishment, due process rights, Evolutionary Refinement, excessive punishment L.B. v. State, Fiore v. White, Florida Law, fourteenth Amendment, jurisprudential upheavals, Post-Conviction Relief, relief, restrictive approach, retroactivity, Salvadore Arroyo, Sizzlin, small pocketknife, Smith, Undue Process
Comments Off
Justin Smith, Expert Testimony in Eminent Domain Proceedings: Oh Frye, Where Art Thou?
56 Fla. L. Rev. 831 (2004) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Respondent, a shopping center owner in Broward County, sought damages resulting from an eminent domain taking by Petitioner, the Florida Department of Transportation. Petitioner’s partial taking resulted in … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Civil Procedure, Evidence, Property Law, Uncategorized
Tagged appraiser, competent expert testimony, damages, Eminent Domain, eminent domain proceedings, expert appraiser, Expert Testimony, factfinder, Florida, Florida Department of Transportation, Frye, Holiday In sale, minimal burden, necessary factors, partial taking, Rochelle v. State Road Department, severance damages, Smith, State Department of Transportation v. Murray, State Road Department v. Falcon
Comments Off