-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: Sixth Amendment
Brooke R. Hardy, Criminal Procedure: Finding the Needle-Toward a More Stringent Standard for Effective Assistance of Counsel
58 Fla. L. Rev. 449 (2006) | | | | TEXT :: Petitioner was convicted by a jury of, among other offenses, brutally murdering a local barkeeper. At the sentencing phase of the bifurcated proceeding, Petitioner’s counsel presented the brief … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Uncategorized
Tagged counsel's preformance, Criminal Procedure, defense counsel, effective assistance of counsel, examination of evidence, habeus corpeus, Hardy, Jurisprudence, murder, post conviction court, professional responsibility, Sixth Amendment, Strickland v. Washington, Wiggins v. Smith
Comments Off
Michelle Reiss Drab, Constitutional Law: Fact or Factor: The Supreme Court Eliminates Sentencing Factors and the Federal Sentencing Guidelines
57 Fla. L. Rev. 987 (2005) | | | | TEXT :: A jury convicted Respondent Booker of possession with intent to distribute at least fifty grams of cocaine, an offense carrying a sentence of 210 to 262 months in … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Uncategorized
Tagged Almendarez-Torres v. united States, Apprendi v. New Jersey, arbitrary, Blakely v. Washington, Booker, Cocaine, constitutional law, Drab, Fanfan, Federal Sentencing Guidelines, jury verdict, Mandatory Minimum sentencing act, McMillan v. Pennsylvania, Patterson v. New york, Sentencing Factors, sentencing hearing, Sentencing Reform Act, Sixth Amendment, unreasonable punishments
Comments Off
Daniel Ryan Koslosky, Constitutional Law: Predictability As Fairness And The Possible Return To Federal Indeterminate Sentencing
57 Fla. L. Rev. 999 (2005) | | | | TEXT :: Respondent was convicted by a jury of possession with intent to distribute at least fifty grams of crack cocaine. During postconviction sentencing, the district court judge found, by … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Evidence, Uncategorized
Tagged Almendarez-Torres v. united States, Apprendi v. NewJersey, Crack cocaine, dispositive question, Evidentiary standards, factfinding, Fairness, federal guidelines, Federal Indeterminate Sentencing, incarcaration, jury trial guarantee, Koslosky, mandatory nature, McMillan v. Pennsylvania, postconviction sentencing, Predictability, Sixth Amendment, state and federal courts, Stevens
Comments Off