-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: Jurisprudence
Andrew Blair-Stanek, Twombly is the Logical Extension of the Mathew v. Eldridge Test for Discovery
62 Fla. L. Rev. 1 (2010) | | | | ABSTRACT :: The Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly has baffled and mystified both practitioners and scholars, casting aside the well-settled rule for … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Civil Procedure, Jurisprudence, Uncategorized
Tagged attorney practice, Bell Atlantic, Civil Procedure, Complaint, Discovery, Eldridge, Jurisprudence, Matthews, Motion to Dismiss, Stanek, Twombly
Comments Off
Benjamin J. Robinson, Distilling Minimum Due Process Requirements for Punitive Damages Awards
60 Fla. L. Rev. 991 (2008) | | | | TEXT :: Philip Morris USA v. Williams, 127 S. Ct. 1057 (2007) An Oregon jury found that Jesse Williams, a long time consumer of Petitioner’s Marlboro cigarettes, died because he … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Procedure, Tort Law, Uncategorized
Tagged Awards, culpability, Due Process, excessive, fourteenth Amendment, Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg, Jesse Williams, Jurisprudence, Marlboro, Minimum Due Process, Philip Morris USA v. Williams, Punitive Damage, Robinson
Comments Off
Jessica Gavrich, Constitutional Law: Judicial Oversights-Inconsistency in Supreme Court Establishment Clause Jurisprudence
58 Fla. L. Rev. 437 (2006) | | | | TEXT :: Texas State Capitol grounds contain a display of seventeen monuments and twenty- one historical markers. Amidst the monuments, Texas state officials erected a six-foot high and three and … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, First Amendment, Jurisprudence, Uncategorized
Tagged 42 U.S.C. § 1983, entanglement, Establishment Clause, Establishment Clause Challenges, Gavich, inevitably likned with parochial education, intertwinement, Jurisprudence, Lemon Test, Lemon v. Kurtzman, Lynch v. Donnelly, Marsh v. Chambers, seperation of church and state, Texas Law, Texas State Capitol
Comments Off
Brooke R. Hardy, Criminal Procedure: Finding the Needle-Toward a More Stringent Standard for Effective Assistance of Counsel
58 Fla. L. Rev. 449 (2006) | | | | TEXT :: Petitioner was convicted by a jury of, among other offenses, brutally murdering a local barkeeper. At the sentencing phase of the bifurcated proceeding, Petitioner’s counsel presented the brief … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Uncategorized
Tagged counsel's preformance, Criminal Procedure, defense counsel, effective assistance of counsel, examination of evidence, habeus corpeus, Hardy, Jurisprudence, murder, post conviction court, professional responsibility, Sixth Amendment, Strickland v. Washington, Wiggins v. Smith
Comments Off
David A. Karp, Why Justice Thomas Should Speak at Oral Argument
61 Fla. L. Rev. 611 (2009) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: The oral argument before the United States Supreme Court in Morse v. Frederick began at 10:03 a.m. in typical fashion, like a high-speed game of chess. Forty-two seconds … Continue reading →