-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: Judges
Nelson Lund, Two Faces of Judicial Restraint (Or Are There More?) in McDonald v. City of Chicago
63 Fla. L. Rev. 487 (2011)| | | | INTRODUCTION :: Since the days of the Warren Court, conservatives have attacked “judicial activism.” Beginning with Judge Robert Bork’s Supreme Court nomination hearings, and lately with increasing frequency, liberals have sought … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Constitutional Law, Governments and Legislation, Judicial Systems, Jurisprudence, Uncategorized
Tagged appointment, article 3 judges, conservative, constitutional law, decisionmaking, different outlook, each model, Faces of Judicial Restraint, Judges, judicial politics, judicial silence, Lund, McDonald v. City of Chichago, model, nomination, opinions, political appointment, Politics, statements, understanding of law, wing
Comments Off
Dhammika Dharmapala, Nuno Garoupa & Joanna M. Shepherd, Legislatures, Judges, and Parole Boards: The Allocation of Discretion Under Determinate Sentencing
62 Fla. L. Rev. 1037 (2010) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Criminal sentencing in the United States has undergone sweeping changes in recent decades. The most significant development in sentencing has been the reallocation of power away from judges … Continue reading
Posted in Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Judicial Systems, Uncategorized
Tagged Blakely, Booker, Criminal Sentencing, Determinate Sentencing, Dharmapala, Discretion, discretionary parole, District of Columbia, Dramatic Changes, Garoupa, Judges, Legislatures, Parole Boards, Sandra Day O'Connor, sentencing guidelines, Shepard, truth-in-sentencing laws
Comments Off
Sandra Day O’Connor, Remarks on Judicial Independence
58 Fla. L. Rev. 1 (2006) | | | | TEXT :: Dedication of the Lawton Chiles Legal Information Center, University of Florida, Levin College of Law, Friday, September 9, 2005 It is a great pleasure to be here at … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Procedure, Civil Rights Law, Constitutional Law, Election Law, Governments and Legislation, Judicial Systems, Uncategorized
Tagged Andrew Jackson, chief justice, discipline, guaranteed freedoms, individual liberty, James Madison, John Marshall, Judges, judicial independance, Republic, rule of law, Sandra Day O'Connor, Worcester v. Georgia
Comments Off
Michael Richard Dimino, Sr., Counter-Majoritarian Power and Judges’ Political Speech
58 Fla. L. Rev. 53 (2006) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Judges and judicial candidates are regularly restricted in their political speech and association by two categories of ethical canons that have only recently come under constitutional examination: those … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, First Amendment, Governments and Legislation, Judicial Systems, Uncategorized
Tagged blind justice, Counter-Majoritarian Power, Dimino, discouraging public from seeing law as a series of policy choices, free speech cases, Judges, judicial elections, judicial policy making, judiciary, Justice Ginsburg, Justice Scalia, Justice Stevens, non-judicial office, on the bench conduct, political activity, Political Speech, pro-speech decisions, self-governance, white
Comments Off