-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: innovative legal methods
Stephanie L. Varela, Damned If You Do, Doomed If You Don’t: Patenting Legal Methods and its Effect on Lawyers’ Professional Responsibilities
60 Fla. L. Rev. 1145 (2008) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Imagine, before advising each client, having to confer with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to determine whether another lawyer already owns a patent to the legal … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Patent Law
Tagged client, envelope of patentable subject matter, federal courts, Grantor retained anuity trusts, GRATs, innovative legal methods, lawyer-client relationship, Lawyers, Legal Methods, legal strategy, Patent, Professional Responsibilities, tax strategy patent, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, USPTO, Varela
Comments Off