-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: Inc. v. Marketing Displays
Mark Alan Thurmon, The Rise and Fall of Trademark Law’s Functionality Doctrine
56 Fla. L. Rev. 243 (2004) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Trademark law’s functionality doctrine is a mess, and the responsibility for this mess rests squarely with the United States Supreme Court. In TrafFix Devices, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, … Continue reading
Posted in Patent Law, Trade Law, Uncategorized
Tagged CCPA, coherent doctrine, Court of Claims and Patent Appeals, design logo, distinguish products, filtering rule, Functionality Doctrine, Inc. v. Marketing Displays, limited functionality defense, modern cases, propriety, PTO, secondary functionality issue, Spray 'N Wash, Thurmon, trade dress claims, Trademark law, trademark protection, trademarks, TrafFix Devices, unfair competition cases, United States Patent and Trademark Office
Comments Off