-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: Grutter
David Crump, The Narrow Tailoring Issue in The Affirmative Action Cases: Reconsidering the Supreme Court’s Approval in Gratz and Grutter of Race-Based Decision-Making by Individualized Discretion
56 Fla. L. Rev. 483 (2004) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: The Supreme Court’s doctrine known as strict scrutiny is divided into two elements. First, there is the requirement that a State identify a “compelling governmental interest” that supports … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Rights Law, Constitutional Law, Discrimination Law, Education Law, Judicial Systems, Uncategorized
Tagged Affirmative Action, compelling government interest, compelling objectives, Crump, Gratz, Grutter, improper practices, Individualized Discretion, minimal probability, Narrow Tailoring Issue, race, Race-Based Decision-Making, strict scrutiny
Comments Off
Dennis J. Shields, A Response to Professor Crump’s Narrow Tailoring Analysis of Grutter: Does It Matter How Many Angels Can Dance on the Head of a Pin?
56 Fla. L. Rev. 761 (2004) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: On occasion the Supreme Court is faced with a conflict between important public values. The two cases contesting race-conscious admissions decision-making at the University of Michigan placed the … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Rights Law, Constitutional Law, Discrimination Law, First Amendment, Uncategorized
Tagged admissions decision-making, Affirmative Action, Bakke, color-blindness, compelling state interest, Crump, Dance on the Head of a Pin, diversity, Dr. Loury, first amendment, Gratz v. Bollinger, Grutter, Grutter v. Bollinger, higher education, Law School, morally irrelevant trait, Narrow Tailoring, non-discrimination, public good, public values, race-conscious, race-consciousness, Regents of the University of California v. Bakke, Shields, strict scrutiny, University of Michigan Law School, wealth and power
Comments Off