-
Stay Connected:
Available At:
Current Issue
January 2015, Vol. 67, No. 1
Articles
Oren Gross, The New Way of War: Is There a Duty to Use Drones?
Reid Kress Weisbord, Trust Term Extension
Xuan-Thao Nguyen, In the Name of Patent Stewardship: The Federal Circuit’s Overreach into Commercial Law
Sean F. Nolon, Bargaining for Development Post-Koontz: How the Supreme Court Invaded Local Government
Gregory Scopino, Do Automated Trading Systems Dream of Manipulating the Price of Futures Contracts? Policing Markets for Improper Trading Practices by Algorithmic Robots
Bethany R. Berger, In the Name of the Child: Race, Gender, and Economics in Adoptive Couple v. Baby Girl
Notes
Jennifer Lada, Bouncing the Proverbial Blank Check: An Argument for Including Candidates for Public Office Within the Scope of the Hobbs Act
Tag Archives: government evidence-gathering activities
David E. Steinberg, The Original Understanding of Unreasonable Searches and Seizures
56 Fla. L. Rev. 1051 (2004) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Today, the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution covers most government evidence-gathering activities. In search and seizure cases, after determining that the Fourth Amendment applies to an … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Evidence, Fourth Amendment, Governments and Legislation, Uncategorized
Tagged automobile checkpoints, Fourth Amendment, government evidence-gathering activities, historical record, oliver v. united states, open fields, Original understanding, random drug tests, search and seizure, sense-enhanced searches, Steinberg, Unreasonable searches and seizures
Comments Off