-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: fourteenth Amendment
Michael J. Hooi, Substantive Due Process: Sex Toys after Lawrence Williams v. Morgan, 478 F.3d 1316 (11th Cir. 2007)
60 Fla. L. Rev. 507 (2008) | | | | TEXT :: Appellants filed suit in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Alabama to enjoin the enforcement of an Alabama statute that prohibits the commercial distribution of … Continue reading
Benjamin J. Robinson, Distilling Minimum Due Process Requirements for Punitive Damages Awards
60 Fla. L. Rev. 991 (2008) | | | | TEXT :: Philip Morris USA v. Williams, 127 S. Ct. 1057 (2007) An Oregon jury found that Jesse Williams, a long time consumer of Petitioner’s Marlboro cigarettes, died because he … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Procedure, Tort Law, Uncategorized
Tagged Awards, culpability, Due Process, excessive, fourteenth Amendment, Honda Motor Co. v. Oberg, Jesse Williams, Jurisprudence, Marlboro, Minimum Due Process, Philip Morris USA v. Williams, Punitive Damage, Robinson
Comments Off
Dustin G. Hall, Constitutional Law: What to Do When a State Fails to Take Notice that its Notice has Failed?
59 Fla. L. Rev. 453 (2007) | | | | TEXT :: After Petitioner paid off his mortgage, his annual property taxes went unpaid. Respondent, Commissioner of State Lands, subsequently certified Petitioner’s property as delinquent. Under the applicable state statute, … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Estates & Trusts Law, Property Law, Securities Law, Uncategorized
Tagged Civil Procedure, constitutional law, Creditors, debt collection, Due Process, fourteenth Amendment, Hall, Inefficient Notice, Interested parties, Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams, Mortgagee, Mullane, Mullane v. Central Hannover Bank & Trust Co., State Notice, state's interest, Summary Judgment
Comments Off
Robert Michael Kline, Constitutional Law: Is There a Protected Interest in Protection (Or Are Court Orders Merely Suggestions)?
58 Fla. L. Rev. 459 (2006) | | | | TEXT :: Respondent’s husband abducted his three little girls, ages 10, 8, and 7, and shot each of them in the head at close range. He committed this abhorrent and … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Procedure, Civil Rights Law, Constitutional Law, Governments and Legislation, Uncategorized
Tagged 42 U.S.C. § 1983, Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth, child abduction, direct/indirect impact test, Due Process Clause, entitlement, fourteenth Amendment, independent source, intangible property interests, Kline, O'Bannon v. Town Court Nursing Center, property interest, Protected interests, protection, restraining orders, Roth Standard, rules of understanding, state law
Comments Off
Justin Smith, Post-Conviction Relief under Florida Law: The Undue Process of the Evolutionary Refinement
57 Fla. L. Rev. 653 (2005) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: “We might go further and say that even those laws which have been written down are best regarded as not unchangeable.” Aristotle “[T]hey are . . . promulgated … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Florida Constitutional Law, Uncategorized
Tagged ambiguity in the law, attempted burglary, Clyde Timothy Bunkley, disproportionate punishment, due process rights, Evolutionary Refinement, excessive punishment L.B. v. State, Fiore v. White, Florida Law, fourteenth Amendment, jurisprudential upheavals, Post-Conviction Relief, relief, restrictive approach, retroactivity, Salvadore Arroyo, Sizzlin, small pocketknife, Smith, Undue Process
Comments Off
Marisa Lopez, Constitutional Law: Lowering the Standard of Strict Scrutiny
56 Fla. L. Rev. 841 (2004) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Respondents adopted a law school admissions policy that considered, among other factors, applicants’ race and ethnicity. The admissions policy was designed to achieve the educational benefits of a … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Contract Law, Discrimination Law, Employment Law, First Amendment, Government Contracts, Labor & Employment Law, Uncategorized
Tagged accepted minorites, Adarand Constructors, compelling state interest, Compensation, constitutional law, disadvantage, discriminatory intent, diverse student body, faically neutral, first amendment, fourteenth Amendment, good faith, Inc. v. Pena, law School admissions policy, Lopez, narrowly tailored means, race and ethnicity, racial classification, racially discriminatory, single-sex institutions, Standard, strict scrutiny, student body diversity, United States v. Virginia, University of California v. Bakke
Comments Off