-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: Florida’s Citrus Canker Law
Charles T. Douglas, Jr., Compensating for Canker: A Sore Subject for Florida’s Citrus Growers: Haire v. Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, 870 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 2004)
57 Fla. L. Rev. 421 (2005) | | | TEXT :: Florida’s citrus canker law (the Canker Law) requires the State to destroy healthy-appearing citrus trees that are within a 1900-foot radius of an infected tree. The Florida Legislature enacted … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Environmental Law, Florida Constitutional Law, Fourth Amendment, Property Law, Uncategorized
Tagged 125-foot radius, 1900-foot radius, Canker Law, circumstances and locality, Citrus, citrus trees, Corneal v. State Plant Board, Department of Acgriculture, Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Mid-Florida Growers, Douglas Jr. Canker, Fifth Amendment, Florida, Florida Citrus Growers, Florida Legislation, Florida Supreme Court, Florida's Citrus Canker Law, Florida's compensation clause, healthy trees, Inverse condemnation claim, Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, nusiance, Oranges, Polk, spreading decline, virulent disease
Comments Off