-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: Florida
Akhil Reed Amar, Bush, Gore, Florida, and the Constitution
61 Fla. L. Rev. 945 (2009) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Ten years ago this week, Dunwody Lecturer Cass Sunstein stood at this podium and offered some thoughts about the then-recent impeachment of President Clinton. Professor Sunstein titled his … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Election Law, Florida Constitutional Law, Governments and Legislation, Jurisprudence, Uncategorized
Tagged Amar, Bill Clinton, Bush, Constitution, Florida, Gore, Impeachment
Comments Off
Brandon Faulkner, Hacking into Data Breach Notification Laws
59 Fla. L. Rev. 1097 (2007) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: On March 23, 2007, a news agency announced that the police department in Gainesville, Florida, arrested six individuals on charges that they had stolen credit card data from … Continue reading
Posted in Business & Corporate Law, Computer & Internet Law, Contract Law, Evidence, Governments and Legislation, Internet Law, Tort Law, Uncategorized
Tagged circumstantial evidence, civil litigation, company practices, Credit card data, cyber-crime, Data Breach, Faulkner, Florida, Gainesville, identity theft, Notification Laws, security policies, stolen identities
Comments Off
Steven J. Wernick, In Accordance with a Public Outcry: Zoning Out Sex Offenders through Residence Restrictions in Florida
58 Fla. L. Rev. 1147 (2006) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: On January 11, 2006, William Smith Jr., a sixty-five-year-old convicted sex offender, moved into a small wooden house behind a day-care center in Ocala, Florida. His housewarming, however, … Continue reading
Posted in Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Florida Constitutional Law, Governments and Legislation, Uncategorized
Tagged conflict, Conflict of Law, convicted Sex offenders, Doe v. miller, Florida, judicial scrutiny, NIMBY, Not in My Backyard, preemption, public outcry, residence restrictions, state and local laws, Wernick, William Smith Jr, zoning
Comments Off
Charles T. Douglas, Jr., Compensating for Canker: A Sore Subject for Florida’s Citrus Growers: Haire v. Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, 870 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 2004)
57 Fla. L. Rev. 421 (2005) | | | TEXT :: Florida’s citrus canker law (the Canker Law) requires the State to destroy healthy-appearing citrus trees that are within a 1900-foot radius of an infected tree. The Florida Legislature enacted … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Environmental Law, Florida Constitutional Law, Fourth Amendment, Property Law, Uncategorized
Tagged 125-foot radius, 1900-foot radius, Canker Law, circumstances and locality, Citrus, citrus trees, Corneal v. State Plant Board, Department of Acgriculture, Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Mid-Florida Growers, Douglas Jr. Canker, Fifth Amendment, Florida, Florida Citrus Growers, Florida Legislation, Florida Supreme Court, Florida's Citrus Canker Law, Florida's compensation clause, healthy trees, Inverse condemnation claim, Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, nusiance, Oranges, Polk, spreading decline, virulent disease
Comments Off
Justin Smith, Expert Testimony in Eminent Domain Proceedings: Oh Frye, Where Art Thou?
56 Fla. L. Rev. 831 (2004) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Respondent, a shopping center owner in Broward County, sought damages resulting from an eminent domain taking by Petitioner, the Florida Department of Transportation. Petitioner’s partial taking resulted in … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Civil Procedure, Evidence, Property Law, Uncategorized
Tagged appraiser, competent expert testimony, damages, Eminent Domain, eminent domain proceedings, expert appraiser, Expert Testimony, factfinder, Florida, Florida Department of Transportation, Frye, Holiday In sale, minimal burden, necessary factors, partial taking, Rochelle v. State Road Department, severance damages, Smith, State Department of Transportation v. Murray, State Road Department v. Falcon
Comments Off