-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: Florida Supreme Court
Kristen Rasmussen, Shedding (False) Light: How the Florida Supreme Court’s Rejection of the Tort Falsely Implies Protection for Media Defendants: Jews for Jesus, Inc. v. Rapp, 997 So. 2d 1098 (Fla. 2008)
61 Fla. L. Rev. 911 (2009) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Edith and Marty Rapp, a Jewish Florida couple, were married until Marty’s death in 2003. Bruce Rapp, Marty’s son and Edith’s stepson, worked for Jews for Jesus. Prior … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, First Amendment, Florida Constitutional Law, Tort Law, Uncategorized
Tagged Brandeis, Cantrell v. Forest City Publishing Co., defamation, defamation by implication, Edith Rapp, false light invasion of privacy, Florida Supreme Court, Inc. v. Hill, invasion of privacy, Jews for Jesus, media defendants, New York Times Co. v. Sullivan, Prosser, Rapp, Time, Warren
Comments Off
Erwin Chemerinsky, The Meaning of Bush v. Gore: Thoughts on Professor Amar’s Analysis
61 Fla. L. Rev. 969 (2009) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: It is tempting to blame the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Bush v. Gore for the evils the Bush Administration inflicted on the nation. If only Al … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Election Law, Florida Constitutional Law, Jurisprudence, Uncategorized
Tagged 200, Algore, Amar, Bush, Bush v. Gore, December 12, election Law, Florida Supreme Court, Gore, Justice Alito, Justice Roberts, political process, Senate Judiciary Committee, Stotomayor, torture, War on Terror
Comments Off
Richard L. Hasen, Bush v. Gore and the Lawlessness Principle: A Comment on Professor Amar
61 Fla. L. Rev. 979 (2009) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Akhil Amar begins his impressive Dunwody Lecture by questioning whether there “are any new things left to say about the Bush-Gore episode.” 1 It is a legitimate question … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Rights Law, Constitutional Law, Election Law, Florida Constitutional Law, Governments and Legislation, Jurisprudence, Uncategorized
Tagged 2008 Senate Election, Article II, Bush, Bush v. Gore, election disputes, election outcomes, Equal protection, Florida Supreme Court, Gore, Hasen, Lawlessness, Minnesota, Professor Amar, Rehnquist, Scalia, statutory intrepretation, Thomas
Comments Off
Ellen D. Katz, From Bush v. Gore to Namudno: A Response to Professor Amar
61 Fla. L. Rev. 991 (2009) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: In his Dunwody Lecture, Professor Akhil Amar invites us to revisit the Bush v. Gore controversy and consider what went wrong. This short essay responds to Professor Amar … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Rights Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Election Law, Governments and Legislation, Jurisprudence, Uncategorized
Tagged Amar, Bush, Bush v. Gore, District No. One, Florida Supreme Court, Gore, Holder, judicial reasoning, Katz, Namudo
Comments Off
Allison Sirica, A Great Gamble: Why Compromise Is the Best Bet to Resolve Florida’s Indian Gaming Crisis
61 Fla. L. Rev. 1201 (2009) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: “Indian gaming is a national multi-billion dollar enterprise and growing.” Even in 2008, amidst an economic downturn, the revenues generated by the tribal gaming industry continued to show … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Contract Law, Florida Constitutional Law, Government Contracts, Governments and Legislation, Healthcare Law, Native Americans, Uncategorized
Tagged Class II gaming, Compromise, Florida Supreme Court, Governor Charles Christ, IGRA, Indian Gaming Crisis, Indian Gaming Regulatory Act, Indian Law, Seminole Tribe of Florida, Seminole Tribe of Florida v. Florida, Sirica, Texas v. United States, tribal casions, tribal gaming industry, work opportunity
Comments Off
Charles T. Douglas, Jr., Compensating for Canker: A Sore Subject for Florida’s Citrus Growers: Haire v. Florida Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services, 870 So. 2d 774 (Fla. 2004)
57 Fla. L. Rev. 421 (2005) | | | TEXT :: Florida’s citrus canker law (the Canker Law) requires the State to destroy healthy-appearing citrus trees that are within a 1900-foot radius of an infected tree. The Florida Legislature enacted … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Environmental Law, Florida Constitutional Law, Fourth Amendment, Property Law, Uncategorized
Tagged 125-foot radius, 1900-foot radius, Canker Law, circumstances and locality, Citrus, citrus trees, Corneal v. State Plant Board, Department of Acgriculture, Department of Agriculture & Consumer Services v. Mid-Florida Growers, Douglas Jr. Canker, Fifth Amendment, Florida, Florida Citrus Growers, Florida Legislation, Florida Supreme Court, Florida's Citrus Canker Law, Florida's compensation clause, healthy trees, Inverse condemnation claim, Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council, nusiance, Oranges, Polk, spreading decline, virulent disease
Comments Off