-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: federal courts
Jennifer Lynch, The Eleventh Amendment and Federal Discovery: A New Threat to Civil Rights Litigation
62 Fla. L. Rev. 203 (2010) | | | | ABSTRACT :: Lawyers for the State of California have argued recently in several federal civil rights cases that the state sovereign immunity doctrine bars all discovery issued … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Civil Rights Law, Copyright Law, Internet Law, Uncategorized
Tagged case law, civil rights protections, Eleventh Amendment, federal courts, Federal Discovery, Federal District Courts, Lynch, March 2007, March 2008, soverign immunity, soverign immunity defense, State employees, tribal soverign immunity, yearly caseload
Comments Off
Stephanie L. Varela, Damned If You Do, Doomed If You Don’t: Patenting Legal Methods and its Effect on Lawyers’ Professional Responsibilities
60 Fla. L. Rev. 1145 (2008) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Imagine, before advising each client, having to confer with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to determine whether another lawyer already owns a patent to the legal … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Patent Law
Tagged client, envelope of patentable subject matter, federal courts, Grantor retained anuity trusts, GRATs, innovative legal methods, lawyer-client relationship, Lawyers, Legal Methods, legal strategy, Patent, Professional Responsibilities, tax strategy patent, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, USPTO, Varela
Comments Off
Matthew J. Richardson, Clarifying and Limiting Fraudulent Joinder
58 Fla. L. Rev. 119 (2006) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Defendants in state court may properly remove civil actions to federal court on the basis of diversity jurisdiction. However, before the defendants remove the action, plaintiffs may have … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Procedure, Tort Law, Transportation Law, Uncategorized
Tagged 12(b)(6), defeating diversity, district court, diverse parties, federaism, federal appellate courts, federal courts, federal rules of civil procedure, fraudulent joinder, judicial economy, no real connection, nondiverse, nondiverse parties, removal, Richardson, separation of powers, state court
Comments Off