-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: Expert Testimony
Anne Bowen Poulin, A Fair Subject for Expert Testimony?
59 Fla. L. Rev. 991 (2007) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: How can two leading commentators take diametrically opposed positions concerning the use of expert testimony to address witness credibility? After the adoption of the Federal Rules of Evidence, … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Civil Procedure, Evidence, Uncategorized
Tagged attack credibility, bolster credibility, common law, evidentiary rules, Expert Testimony, expert witness, federal rules of evidence, Graham, jury's special province, Key witness, lie detector, Lies, pathological condition, Poulin, Truthfulness, United States v. Hiss, Weinstein, witness credibility
Comments Off
Justin Smith, Expert Testimony in Eminent Domain Proceedings: Oh Frye, Where Art Thou?
56 Fla. L. Rev. 831 (2004) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Respondent, a shopping center owner in Broward County, sought damages resulting from an eminent domain taking by Petitioner, the Florida Department of Transportation. Petitioner’s partial taking resulted in … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Civil Procedure, Evidence, Property Law, Uncategorized
Tagged appraiser, competent expert testimony, damages, Eminent Domain, eminent domain proceedings, expert appraiser, Expert Testimony, factfinder, Florida, Florida Department of Transportation, Frye, Holiday In sale, minimal burden, necessary factors, partial taking, Rochelle v. State Road Department, severance damages, Smith, State Department of Transportation v. Murray, State Road Department v. Falcon
Comments Off