-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: Employee Retirement Income Security Act
E. Farish Percy, Applying the Common Fund Doctrine to an Erisa-Governed Employee Benefit Plan’s Claim for Subrogation or Reimbursement
61 Fla. L. Rev. 55 (2009) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Imagine that you sustain brain injury when your car collides with another vehicle. You incur $ 1 million in medical expenses, which your employee welfare benefit plan, governed … Continue reading
Posted in Contract Law, Insurance Law, Uncategorized
Tagged 502(a)(3), Common Fund Doctrine, Employee Benefit, Employee Retirement Income Security Act, Erisa, Farish, Mid Atlantic Medical Services, Reimbursement, Sereboff, Subrogation
Comments Off
Lindsay Roshkind, Employment Law: An Adverse Action Against Employers: The Supreme Court’s Expansion of Title VII’s Anti-Retaliation Provision
59 Fla. L. Rev. 707 (2007) | | | | TEXT :: State law required Petitioner to maintain workers’ compensation coverage for his freight trucking business. Petitioner contracted with Respondent to provide this insurance. After Petitioner canceled the policy and … Continue reading
Posted in Bankruptcy, Civil Rights Law, Discrimination Law, Employment Law, Labor & Employment Law, Uncategorized
Tagged 11 U.S.C., 506(b), 507(a)(5), 64(a)(5), Bankruptcy Code, Chapter 11, contributions to an employee benefit plan, Employee Retirement Income Security Act, Inc., nonconsensual, Postpetition, Priority Status, Union employees, United States v. Embassy Restaurant, United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises
Comments Off