-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: damages
David Marcus, Flawed but Noble: Desegregation Litigation and its Implications for the Modern Class Action
63 Fla. L. Rev. 657 (2011)| | | | INTRODUCTION :: From the perspective of the present day, Rule 23 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure contains a difficult puzzle. After a court certifies a class pursuant to Rule … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Procedure, Civil Rights Law, Class Actions, Discrimination Law, Education Law, Uncategorized
Tagged Class Action, class certification, class members, damages, decertification, declaratory relief, discrimination, estoppell, help, injunctive relief, money damages, opt out, representation, res judicata, right to sue, rule 23, Rule 23(b)(2), theory, trial rights, waiver
Comments Off
Kevin M. Clermont, Sequencing the Issues for Judicial Decisionmaking: Limitations from Jurisdictional Primacy and Intrasuit Preclusion
63 Fla. L. Rev. 301 (2011)| | | | ABSTRACT :: This Article treats the order of decision on multiple issues in a single case. That order can be very important, with a lot at stake for the court, society, and … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Civil Procedure, Judicial Systems, Uncategorized
Tagged Article 3, Article III, Civil Procedure, Clermont, common issues, damages, Intrasuit Preclusion, Judicial Decisionmaking, jurisdiction, jurisdictional defenese, Jurisdictional Primacy, order, order of decision, Sequencing, steel Co.-Ruhrgas, Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Comments Off
Benjamin J. Steinberg, Discounted Medical Bills and Conflicting Applications of Florida Statutes §768.76 as A Rule of Evidence
62 Fla. L. Rev. 1431 (2010) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Marcie was a loving mother and a hard worker. But all of this was stripped away in an instant. Marcie lost both her daughter and her ability to … Continue reading
Posted in Computer & Internet Law, Criminal Law, Evidence, Internet Law, Media Law, Tort Law, Uncategorized
Tagged 768.76, collateral sources, Conflicting Applications, contributions, damage award, damages, Discount, double recovery, e-mail list manager, Elevator Corp., Evidence, excess recovery, Florida Statutes, Fourth District Court of Appeals, Frohman, future medical care, Goble, health insurance coverage, information, job loss, jury, Lasky, lifetime of medical care, loving Mother, Marcie, Medical Bills, negligent driver, operations, past benefits, penalties, reasonable value of care, resulting injuries, retail costs, rule of evidence, rule of law, set off, several surgeries, split in authority, Steinberg, Thyssenkrup, tort case, West Palm Beach
Comments Off
Justin Smith, Expert Testimony in Eminent Domain Proceedings: Oh Frye, Where Art Thou?
56 Fla. L. Rev. 831 (2004) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Respondent, a shopping center owner in Broward County, sought damages resulting from an eminent domain taking by Petitioner, the Florida Department of Transportation. Petitioner’s partial taking resulted in … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Civil Procedure, Evidence, Property Law, Uncategorized
Tagged appraiser, competent expert testimony, damages, Eminent Domain, eminent domain proceedings, expert appraiser, Expert Testimony, factfinder, Florida, Florida Department of Transportation, Frye, Holiday In sale, minimal burden, necessary factors, partial taking, Rochelle v. State Road Department, severance damages, Smith, State Department of Transportation v. Murray, State Road Department v. Falcon
Comments Off