-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: Civil Procedure
Kevin M. Clermont, Sequencing the Issues for Judicial Decisionmaking: Limitations from Jurisdictional Primacy and Intrasuit Preclusion
63 Fla. L. Rev. 301 (2011)| | | | ABSTRACT :: This Article treats the order of decision on multiple issues in a single case. That order can be very important, with a lot at stake for the court, society, and … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Civil Procedure, Judicial Systems, Uncategorized
Tagged Article 3, Article III, Civil Procedure, Clermont, common issues, damages, Intrasuit Preclusion, Judicial Decisionmaking, jurisdiction, jurisdictional defenese, Jurisdictional Primacy, order, order of decision, Sequencing, steel Co.-Ruhrgas, Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Comments Off
Andrew Blair-Stanek, Twombly is the Logical Extension of the Mathew v. Eldridge Test for Discovery
62 Fla. L. Rev. 1 (2010) | | | | ABSTRACT :: The Supreme Court’s 2007 decision in Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly has baffled and mystified both practitioners and scholars, casting aside the well-settled rule for … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Civil Procedure, Jurisprudence, Uncategorized
Tagged attorney practice, Bell Atlantic, Civil Procedure, Complaint, Discovery, Eldridge, Jurisprudence, Matthews, Motion to Dismiss, Stanek, Twombly
Comments Off
Lisa Eichhorn, Sense of Disentitlement: Frame-Shifting and Metaphor in Ashcroft v. Iqbal
62 Fla. L. Rev. 951 (2010) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Judicial opinions analyzing civil procedure issues are unlikely sources of rich imagery. Recent legal scholarship on metaphor has focused on sexier areas of the law, such as constitutional … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Civil Procedure, Contract Law, Uncategorized
Tagged allegations, anxieties, Ashcroft, Bell Atlantic, Civil Procedure, detailed evidence, detailed facts, Discovery, Disentitlement, Eichorn, fears and resentments, Frame-Shifting, Iqbal, litigation process, Motion to Dismiss, plausibility, specificity of pleadings, Twombly
Comments Off
C. Douglas Floyd, In Honor of Walter O. Weyrauch: Three Faces of Supplemental Jurisdiction after the Demise of United Mine Workers V. Gibbs
60 Fla. L. Rev. 277 (2008) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: In United Mine Workers v. Gibbs, the Supreme Court rejected the narrow “cause of action” test announced in Hurn v. Oursler for what was then termed pendent-claim jurisdiction … Continue reading
Christopher R. Leslie, The Significance of Silence: Collective Action Problems and Class Action Settlements
59 Fla. L. Rev. 71 (2007) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: When the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure first provided for a class action vehicle, hopes were high that individuals would be able to act collectively to hold corporations … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Business & Corporate Law, Civil Procedure, Uncategorized
Tagged aggregation of claims, Civil Procedure, Class ACtion Lawsuits, Collective Action, collusion, Federal Rules, individual compensation, Leslie, settlement, Silence
Comments Off
Dustin G. Hall, Constitutional Law: What to Do When a State Fails to Take Notice that its Notice has Failed?
59 Fla. L. Rev. 453 (2007) | | | | TEXT :: After Petitioner paid off his mortgage, his annual property taxes went unpaid. Respondent, Commissioner of State Lands, subsequently certified Petitioner’s property as delinquent. Under the applicable state statute, … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Estates & Trusts Law, Property Law, Securities Law, Uncategorized
Tagged Civil Procedure, constitutional law, Creditors, debt collection, Due Process, fourteenth Amendment, Hall, Inefficient Notice, Interested parties, Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams, Mortgagee, Mullane, Mullane v. Central Hannover Bank & Trust Co., State Notice, state's interest, Summary Judgment
Comments Off