-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: Capital Punishment
Dale E. Ho, Silent at Sentencing: Waiver Doctrine and a Capital Defendant’s Right to Present Migitating Evidence After Schriro v. Landrigan
62 Fla. L. Rev. 763 (2010) | | | | CASE COMMENT ::The consideration of mitigating evidence-evidence that weighs against the imposition of the death penalty in a capital defendant’s individual case-has been deemed a “constitutionally indispensable” feature of a … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Rights Law, Constitutional Law, Energy & Utilities Law, Uncategorized
Tagged abritrary imposition of death penalty, Capital Defendant, Capital Punishment, death sentence, Eighth Amendment, Habeas Relief, Ho, knowingly, Landrigan, longstanding precedent, Mitigating Evidence, Ninth Circuit, Schriro, Sentencing, Silence, understanding, Waiver Doctrine
Comments Off
Steven J. Wernick, Constitutional Law: Elimination of the Juvenile Death Penalty-Substituting Moral Judgment for a True National Consensus
58 Fla. L. Rev. 471 (2006) | | | | TEXT :: Respondent was convicted of first-degree murder for the torturous abduction and drowning of a woman and was sentenced to death upon the recommendation of the jury. Respondent committed … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Uncategorized
Tagged 17 years old, atkins v. Virginia, Capital Punishment, Coker v. Georgia, cruel and unusual punishment, Eighth Amendment, Elimination, evolving standards of decency, Juvenile Death Penalty, Kline, mentally challenged, mentally retarded criminals, Moral Judgment, National Consensus, rape, retarded, Stanford v. Kentucky
Comments Off
J. Richard Broughton, The Second Death Of Capital Punishment
58 Fla. L. Rev. 639 (2006) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Political life is sometimes tragic. As a conservative instrument for safeguarding the government’s obligation and ability to control the governed (which, as Madison reminds us, is a prerequisite … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Uncategorized
Tagged atkins v. Virginia, Broughton, Capital Punishment, Constitutional propriety, Death Penalty, Eighth Amendment, Exemption, Furman, Furman-era, immodest understanding, Madison, mentally retarded, political wisdom, post-Furman, Rehnquist, Roper v. Simmons, Self-control
Comments Off