Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: Article III
Kevin M. Clermont, Sequencing the Issues for Judicial Decisionmaking: Limitations from Jurisdictional Primacy and Intrasuit Preclusion
63 Fla. L. Rev. 301 (2011)| | | | ABSTRACT :: This Article treats the order of decision on multiple issues in a single case. That order can be very important, with a lot at stake for the court, society, and … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Civil Procedure, Judicial Systems, Uncategorized
Tagged Article 3, Article III, Civil Procedure, Clermont, common issues, damages, Intrasuit Preclusion, Judicial Decisionmaking, jurisdiction, jurisdictional defenese, Jurisdictional Primacy, order, order of decision, Sequencing, steel Co.-Ruhrgas, Subject Matter Jurisdiction
Comments Off
Jeffrey A. Bekiares, In Country, on Parole, out of Luck-Regulating away Alien Eligibility for Adjustment of Status Contrary to Congressional Intent and Sound Immigration Policy
58 Fla. L. Rev. 713 (2006) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Immigrants are a daily part of American life. They work in every sector of the economy and form strong social and familial bonds in the community. The legislative … Continue reading
Posted in Administrative Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Immigration Law, Uncategorized
Tagged Adjustment of Status, Alien Eligibility, alien removal, arriving alien, Article III, attorney general, ban, Bekiares, Congressional Intent, deporation, IIRIRA, Illegal Immigrantion Reform and Immigrant Responsibility Act of 1996, Immigration Policy, INA, jurisdiction, Parole, paroled aliens, re-entry, Succar v. Ashcroft, Title 8, § 245.1
Comments Off



