Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Tag Archives: 11 U.S.C.
Andrew S. Brown, Breaking Up and Making Out (Rich): Recommendations for Revision of the Bankruptcy Code Provisions Governing Break-Up Fees Used by Stalking Horse Bidders in § 363 Bankruptcy Asset Sales
62 Fla. L. Rev. 1463 (2010) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Since December 2007, the United States has suffered through a “Great Recession.” The stock market had plummeted more than 40% from its peak as investors pulled their money … Continue reading
Posted in Bankruptcy, Business & Corporate Law, Governments and Legislation, Tort Law
Tagged 11 U.S.C., 363, Bankruptcy Asset Sales, break-up fee, Breaking UP, Brown, economic crisis, Making out Rich, Revision, sale of companies
Comments Off
Lindsay Roshkind, Employment Law: An Adverse Action Against Employers: The Supreme Court’s Expansion of Title VII’s Anti-Retaliation Provision
59 Fla. L. Rev. 707 (2007) | | | | TEXT :: State law required Petitioner to maintain workers’ compensation coverage for his freight trucking business. Petitioner contracted with Respondent to provide this insurance. After Petitioner canceled the policy and … Continue reading
Posted in Bankruptcy, Civil Rights Law, Discrimination Law, Employment Law, Labor & Employment Law, Uncategorized
Tagged 11 U.S.C., 506(b), 507(a)(5), 64(a)(5), Bankruptcy Code, Chapter 11, contributions to an employee benefit plan, Employee Retirement Income Security Act, Inc., nonconsensual, Postpetition, Priority Status, Union employees, United States v. Embassy Restaurant, United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises
Comments Off



