Categories
Number 1 January 2019
Number 2 March 2019
Number 3 May 2019
Number 4 July 2019
Number 5 September 2019
Number 6 November 2019
Peter Byrne
The Freedmen’s Memorial to Lincoln: A Postscript to Stone Monuments and Flexible Laws
David Horrigan
Activist Judges?: Technology, Rule 1, and the Limits of Judge Matthewman’s New Paradigm for E-Discovery
Response to William Matthewman, Towards a New Paradigm for E-Discovery in Civil Litigation: A Judicial Perspective
Gregory M. Stein
Swallowing its Own Tail: The Circular Grammar of Background Principles Under Lucas
Response to Michael C. Blumm & Rachel G. Wolfard, Revisiting Background Principles in Takings Litigation
Richard C. Boldt
Criminalization and Normalization: Some Thoughts About Offenders With Serious Mental Illness
Response to E. Lea Johnston, Reconceptualizing Criminal Justice Reform for Offenders with Serious Mental Illness
Lonny Hoffman and Erin Horan Mendez
Wrongful Removals
Response to Joan Steinman, Waiving Removal, Waiving Remand—The Hidden and Unequal Dangers of Participating in Litigation
Daniel Farber
Requiem for a Heavyweight: The Decline and Fall of Lucas v. South Carolina Coastal Council
Response to Michael C. Blumm & Rachel G. Wolfard, Revisiting Background Principles in Takings Litigation
Anne L. Kelley
Border Searches in a Digital Age: Finding Alignment Amidst a Diluted Right
Student Note
Peter Byrne
Stone Monuments and Flexible Laws: Removing Confederate Monuments Through Historic Preservation Laws
Response to Jess R. Phelps & Jessica Owley, Etched in Stone: Historic Preservation Law and Confederate Monuments
John H. Blume & Megan E. Barnes
‘Nothing Compares 2 U:’ A Response to Beyond Compare: A Codefendant’s Prison Sentence as a Mitigating Factor in Death Penalty Cases
Response to Jeffrey Kirchmeier, Beyond Compare? A Codefendant’s Prison Sentence as a Mitigating Factor in Death Penalty Cases
William F. Hamilton
Magistrate Judge Matthewman’s New E-Discovery Paradigm and Solving the E-Discovery Paradox
Response to William Matthewman, Towards a New Paradigm for E-Discovery in Civil Litigation: A Judicial Perspective
Andrew Jay Peck
A View From the Bench and the Trench(es) in Response to Judge Matthewman’s New Paradigm for EDiscovery: It’s More Complicated
Response to William Matthewman, Towards a New Paradigm for E-Discovery in Civil Litigation: A Judicial Perspective
Robert L. Glicksman
Swallowing The Rule: The Lucas Background Principles Exception to Takings Liability
Response to Michael C. Blumm & Rachel G. Wolfard, Revisiting Background Principles in Takings Litigation
Kimbrell Hines
To Protect Victims, Cross-Examine Victims
Student Note
Zachary Bray
Diagnosing the Ills of American Monument-Protection Laws: A Response to Phelps and Owley’s Etched in Stone
Response to Jess Phelps and Jessica Owley, Etched in Stone: Historic Preservation Law and Confederate Monuments
Shubha Ghosh
Do the Games Never End?
Response to Pamela Samuelson, Staking the Boundaries of Software Copyrights in the Shadow of Patents
William D. Araiza
Objectively Correct
Reply to Steven D. Smith, Objective Animus?
Jason Bobe, Michelle N. Meyer & George Church
Privacy and Agency are Critical to a Flourishing Biomedical Research Enterprise: Misconceptions About the Role of CLIA
Response to Barbara Evans and Susan Wolf, A Faustian Bargain that Undermines Research Participants’ Privacy Rights and Return of Results
Steven D. Smith
Objective Animus?
Response to William Araiza, Animus and Its Discontents
Jessica Williams
Beyond the Binary: Protecting Sexual Minorities from Workplace Discrimination
Student Note
Dina H. Arouri
Will Capitalism Kill Compassion—An Analysis of the Future of Corporate Liability Under the Alien Tort Statute
Student Note