Categories
Number 1 January 2018
Number 2 March 2018
Number 3 May 2018
Number 4 July 2018
Number 5 September 2018
Number 6 November 2018
John M. Newman
Expanding the Merger Narrative: A Response to Sokol
Response to D. Daniel Sokol, Vertical Mergers and Entrepreneurial Exit
Cynthia V. Ward
Two Models for Amending The ‘Fleeing Felon’ Rule
Response to Robert Leider, Taming Self-Defense: Using Deadly Force to Prevent Escapes
Joanna P. Kimbell
The Role of GPS and Cell Phone Tracking of Employees in Big Data Law
Response to Marc McAllister, GPS and Cell Phone Tracking of Employees
Benjamin M. Leff
What is Lost When Philanthropy Avoids Philanthropy Law?
Response to Dana Brakman Reiser, Disruptive Philanthropy: Chan-Zuckerberg, the Limited Liability Company, and the Millionaire Next Door
Dmitry Bam
Judicial Partisanship in a Partisan Era: A Reply to Professor Robertson
Response to Cassandra Burke Robertson, Judicial Impartiality in a Partisan Era
Gregory Dolin
Estopping Patent Harassment: A Response to Christa J. Laser
Response to Christa J. Laser, The Scope of IPR Estoppel: A Statutory, Historical, and Normative Analysis
Tigran W. Eldred
Judicial Impartiality in an Empirical Era
Response to Cassandra Burke Robertson, Judicial Impartiality in a Partisan Era
Eda Katharine Tinto
Reentry Services for the Removed
Response to Amy F. Kimpel, Coordinating Community Reintegration Services for “Deportable Alien” Defendants: A Moral and Financial Imperative
Bruce A. Green and Rebecca Roiphe
Learning to Live with Judicial Partisanship: A Response to Cassandra Burke Robertson
Response to Cassandra Burke Robertson, Judicial Impartiality in a Partisan Era
Richard Delgado
A U.S.–Mexican Law School for Deportees: A Response to Amy Kimpel
Response to Amy Kimpel, Coordinating Community Reintegration Services for “Deportable Alien” Defendants: A Moral and Financial Imperative
Andres Sawicki
A View of Copyright from the Digital Ground
Response to Cathay Y. N. Smith, Beware the Slender Man: Intellectual Property and Internet Folklore
Deborah J. Challener
Teaching and Learning Personal Jurisdiction After The Stealth Revolution
Response to Michael H. Hoffheimer, The Stealth Revolution in Personal Jurisdiction
Melanie Kalmanson
Neither the Problem Nor the Solution Lies Solely with the Judiciary: Response to Robertson’s Judicial Impartiality in a Partisan Era
Response to Cassandra Burke Robertson, Judicial Impartiality in a Partisan Era
John Murdock
Monumental Disagreements: A Call to Move Away From “Sign Here” Scholarship
Response to Richard H. Seamon, Dismantling Monuments
Elizabeth Rosenblatt
Who Will Speak for the Slender Man?: Dialogism and Dilemmas in Character Copyright
Response to Cathay Y. N. Smith, Beware the Slender Man: Intellectual Property and Internet Folklore
Judy M. Cornett
The Not-So-Stealthy Revolution in Personal Jurisdiction
Response to Michael H. Hoffheimer, The Stealth Revolution in Personal Jurisdiction
Hope Babcock
Coloring Outside The Lines: A Response to Professor Seamon’s Article Dismantling Monuments
Response to Richard H. Seamon, Dismantling Monuments
John C. Ruple
A Response to Dismantling Monuments
Response to Richard H. Seamon, Dismantling Monuments
Michael Vitiello
Reflections on Hoffheimer’s The Stealth Revolution in Personal Jurisdiction
Response to Michael H. Hoffheimer, The Stealth Revolution in Personal Jurisdiction
Patrick J. Borchers
The Muddy-Booted, Disingenuous Revolution in Personal Jurisdiction
Response to Michael H. Hoffheimer, The Stealth Revolution in Personal Jurisdiction
Samuel Levine
Another Look at Lawyer Discretion to Assist Clients in Unlawful Conduct
Response to Paul R. Tremblay, At Your Service: Lawyer Discretion to Assist Clients in Unlawful Conduct
W. Bradley Wendel
Lawyers’ Constrained Fiduciary Duties: A Comment on Paul R. Tremblay, At Your Service: Lawyer Discretion to Assist Clients in Unlawful Conduct
Response to Paul R. Tremblay, At Your Service: Lawyer Discretion to Assist Clients in Unlawful Conduct
Bruce A. Green
May Lawyers Assist Clients in Some Unlawful Conduct?: A Response to Paul Tremblay
Response to Paul R. Tremblay, At Your Service: Lawyer Discretion to Assist Clients in Unlawful Conduct