-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Category Archives: Jurisprudence
Lawrence A. Cunningham, Traditional Versus Economic Analysis: Evidence from Cardozo and Posner Torts Opinions
62 Fla. L. Rev. 667 (2010) | | | | CASE COMMENT ::This Article contributes a new approach and evidence to the longstanding debate concerning the relative merits of traditional legal analysis compared to contemporary economic analysis of law. Proponents … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Healthcare Law, Jurisprudence, Tort Law, Uncategorized
Tagged Cardozo, Cunningham, descriptive accuracy, doctrinal, Economic analysis, normative appeal, philosophical, Posner, techniques, theoretical, Tort Opinions, Traditional, traditional legal analysis
Comments Off
Akhil Reed Amar, Bush, Gore, Florida, and the Constitution
61 Fla. L. Rev. 945 (2009) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Ten years ago this week, Dunwody Lecturer Cass Sunstein stood at this podium and offered some thoughts about the then-recent impeachment of President Clinton. Professor Sunstein titled his … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Election Law, Florida Constitutional Law, Governments and Legislation, Jurisprudence, Uncategorized
Tagged Amar, Bill Clinton, Bush, Constitution, Florida, Gore, Impeachment
Comments Off
Erwin Chemerinsky, The Meaning of Bush v. Gore: Thoughts on Professor Amar’s Analysis
61 Fla. L. Rev. 969 (2009) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: It is tempting to blame the United States Supreme Court’s decision in Bush v. Gore for the evils the Bush Administration inflicted on the nation. If only Al … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Election Law, Florida Constitutional Law, Jurisprudence, Uncategorized
Tagged 200, Algore, Amar, Bush, Bush v. Gore, December 12, election Law, Florida Supreme Court, Gore, Justice Alito, Justice Roberts, political process, Senate Judiciary Committee, Stotomayor, torture, War on Terror
Comments Off
Richard L. Hasen, Bush v. Gore and the Lawlessness Principle: A Comment on Professor Amar
61 Fla. L. Rev. 979 (2009) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Akhil Amar begins his impressive Dunwody Lecture by questioning whether there “are any new things left to say about the Bush-Gore episode.” 1 It is a legitimate question … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Rights Law, Constitutional Law, Election Law, Florida Constitutional Law, Governments and Legislation, Jurisprudence, Uncategorized
Tagged 2008 Senate Election, Article II, Bush, Bush v. Gore, election disputes, election outcomes, Equal protection, Florida Supreme Court, Gore, Hasen, Lawlessness, Minnesota, Professor Amar, Rehnquist, Scalia, statutory intrepretation, Thomas
Comments Off
Ellen D. Katz, From Bush v. Gore to Namudno: A Response to Professor Amar
61 Fla. L. Rev. 991 (2009) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: In his Dunwody Lecture, Professor Akhil Amar invites us to revisit the Bush v. Gore controversy and consider what went wrong. This short essay responds to Professor Amar … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Rights Law, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Election Law, Governments and Legislation, Jurisprudence, Uncategorized
Tagged Amar, Bush, Bush v. Gore, District No. One, Florida Supreme Court, Gore, Holder, judicial reasoning, Katz, Namudo
Comments Off
David A. Karp, Why Justice Thomas Should Speak at Oral Argument
61 Fla. L. Rev. 611 (2009) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: The oral argument before the United States Supreme Court in Morse v. Frederick began at 10:03 a.m. in typical fashion, like a high-speed game of chess. Forty-two seconds … Continue reading →