Category Archives: Jurisprudence

Jordan E. Pratt, An Open and Shut Case: Why (and How) The Eleventh Circuit Should Restrain the Government’s Forum Closure Power

63 Fla. L. Rev. 1487 (2011)| | | |||| The Supreme Court has made it clear that when the government opens a nontraditional public forum, it retains the power to shut down the forum subsequently. But the Court has not … Continue reading

Posted in Civil Procedure, Civil Rights Law, Constitutional Law, First Amendment, Governments and Legislation, Jurisprudence, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Jordan E. Pratt, An Open and Shut Case: Why (and How) The Eleventh Circuit Should Restrain the Government’s Forum Closure Power

Courtney Gaughan, Some More Watters, Please: The Dodd-Frank Act’s New Preemption Standards Lighten Consumers’ Wallets

63 Fla. L. Rev. 1459 (2011)| | | | The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act precipitates innumerable changes that will both directly and indirectly shape the future of the financial industry. This Note addresses two important subsets … Continue reading

Posted in Commercial Law, Governments and Legislation, Jurisprudence, Trade Law, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Courtney Gaughan, Some More Watters, Please: The Dodd-Frank Act’s New Preemption Standards Lighten Consumers’ Wallets

Stewart E. Sterk and Kimberly J. Brunelle, Zoning Finality: Reconceptualizing Res Judicata Doctrine in Land Use Cases

63 Fla. L. Rev. 1139 (2011)| | | ARTICLE :: Zoning disputes provide many Americans with their only firsthand exposure to the workings of democratic government. Land use issues trigger participation because neighbors perceive the wrong kind of development as … Continue reading

Posted in Civil Procedure, Environmental Law, Judicial Systems, Jurisprudence, Liability Law, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Stewart E. Sterk and Kimberly J. Brunelle, Zoning Finality: Reconceptualizing Res Judicata Doctrine in Land Use Cases

Jonathan Witmer-Rich, Interrogation and the Roberts Court

63 Fla. L. Rev. 1189 (2011)| | | ARTICLE :: Through 2010, the Roberts Court decided five cases involving the rules for police interrogation under the Fifth and Sixth Amendments: Kansas v. Ventris; Montejo v. Louisiana; Florida v. Powell; Maryland … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney Practice, Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Federal Courts, Judicial Systems, Jurisprudence, Uncategorized | Comments Off on Jonathan Witmer-Rich, Interrogation and the Roberts Court

Jim Gash, The End Of An Era: The Supreme Court (Finally) Butts Out of Punitive Damages For Good

63 Fla. L. Rev. 525 (2011)| | | | INTRODUCTION :: It is finally over. The Supreme Court’s incursion into punitive damages jurisprudence has unceremoniously ended, but not before the Court, under the guise of substantive due process, erected a … Continue reading

Posted in Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Governments and Legislation, Judicial Systems, Jurisprudence, Tort Law, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Jim Gash, The End Of An Era: The Supreme Court (Finally) Butts Out of Punitive Damages For Good

Nelson Lund, Two Faces of Judicial Restraint (Or Are There More?) in McDonald v. City of Chicago

63 Fla. L. Rev. 487 (2011)| | | | INTRODUCTION :: Since the days of the Warren Court, conservatives have attacked “judicial activism.” Beginning with Judge Robert Bork’s Supreme Court nomination hearings, and lately with increasing frequency, liberals have sought … Continue reading

Posted in Attorney Practice, Constitutional Law, Governments and Legislation, Judicial Systems, Jurisprudence, Uncategorized | Tagged , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | Comments Off on Nelson Lund, Two Faces of Judicial Restraint (Or Are There More?) in McDonald v. City of Chicago