-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Category Archives: Intellectual Property
Samuel J. Horovitz, Two Wrongs Don’t Negate a Copyright: Don’t Make Students Turnitin if You Won’t Give it Back
60 Fla. L. Rev. 229 (2008) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: The story goes something like this: There was a particularly difficult college professor notorious for a low grading scale. After years of low grade following low grade, one … Continue reading
Posted in Copyright Law, Education Law, First Amendment, Intellectual Property, Trade Law, Uncategorized
Tagged Copyright, Education, fair use inquiry, Horovitz, intellectual property rights, McLean High school, Plagerism, plagiarism prevention, Students, Turnitin
Comments Off
Larry Dougherty, Does a Cartel Aim Expressly? Trusting Calder Personal Jurisdiction when Antitrust Goes Global?
60 Fla. L. Rev. 915 (2008) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Suppose your law firm represents CrabApple, the large, California-based manufacturer of the BuyPod, a portable digital music player. CrabApple also sells songs from its online music store, BuyTunes, … Continue reading
Posted in Antitrust & Trade Law, Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, International Law, Tort Law, Uncategorized
Tagged Antitrust, Calder Personal Jurisdiction, Calder v. Jones, Cartel, CrabApple, Dougherty, extension, Global, International Law, libel, National Enquirer, Shirley Jones, torts
Comments Off
David S. Levine, Secrecy and Unaccountability: Trade Secrets in our Public Infrastructure
59 Fla. L. Rev. 135 (2007) | | | | ABSTRACT :: Trade secrecy-the intellectual property doctrine that allows businesses to keep commercially valuable information secret for a potentially unlimited amount of time- is increasingly intruding in the operation of … Continue reading
Posted in Business & Corporate Law, Intellectual Property, Trade Law, Uncategorized
Tagged Levine, Private Commerce, Public Infrastructure, Secrecy, Trade Secrets, transparency, Unaccountability
Comments Off
Jeffrey L. Harrison, Trademark Law and Status Signaling: Tattoos for the Privileged
59 Fla. L. Rev. 195 (2007) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: The motivations for buying a good or service are highly complex. At the most basic level, people buy goods because of what the goods do or because of … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Procedure, Intellectual Property, Judicial Systems, Trade Law, Uncategorized
Tagged advertisement, Branding, Etro, functional quality, Harrison, marks, person-to-person, Privaleged, public policy, status signaling, Tatoos, Trademark law
Comments Off
Kelly Casey Mullally, Patent Hermeneutics: Form and Substance in Claim Construction
59 Fla. L. Rev. 333 (2007) | | | | ABSTRACT :: The claims section of a patent performs an important public notice function in patent law. The claims inform us of the boundaries delineating the subject matter over which … Continue reading
Posted in Intellectual Property, Patent Law, Uncategorized
Tagged Claim Construction, Hermeneutics, Methodology, Mullaly, Patent, patent Claims, Phillips v. AWH corp., private drafting behavior, public notice
Comments Off
Irene Calboli, Trademark Assignment “with Goodwill”: A Concept Whose Time Has Gone
57 Fla. L. Rev. 771 (2005) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Imagine that tomorrow, when you order your morning STARBUCKS Caramel Macchiato, the coffee tastes richer than usual; you then notice a label on the shop door, and on … Continue reading
Posted in Intellectual Property, Uncategorized
Tagged assignee, assignment in gross, assignments de facto, Beetle Car, BMW, Calboli, consumer confusion, consumer deception, contradictory case law, Goodwill, Lanham Act, legislative history, per se, Section 10, Starbucks, trademark, Trademark Act, Trademark assignment, trademark goodwill, trademark transfers, Volkswagon
Comments Off