Florida Law Review News
Fla. L. Rev. Forum
Fatma Marouf Response to Professor Holper’s Article, Redefining “Particularly Serious Crimes” in Refugee Law Response to Mary Holper, Redefining “Particularly Serious Crimes” in Refugee Law An individual who faces a significant risk of persecution in her home country is barred from asylum in the United States if she is convicted of a “particularly serious crime” (“PSC”). Despite […]
Fla. L. Rev. Forum
Rebecca Sharpless Balancing Future Harms: The “Particularly Serious Crime” Bar to Refugee Protection Response to Mary Holper, Redefining “Particularly Serious Crimes” in Refugee Law The particularly serious crime (PSC) analysis in U.S. immigration law stands as a gatekeeper to protection from persecution abroad. Asylum applicants who meet the definition of a refugee are statutorily disqualified from […]
Fla. L. Rev. Forum
Timothy Sandefur Due Process and Agency: Compliments, Not Substitutes Response to Gary Lawson & Guy I. Seidman, By Any Other Name: Rational Basis Inquiry and the Federal Government’s Fiduciary Duty of Care In 1816, in answer to an inquiry from a lawyer, former president Thomas Jefferson wrote that the political writings of Aristotle, valuable as they may […]
Fla. L. Rev. Forum
Sotirios A. Barber Are Professors Lawson and Seidman Serious About A “Fiduciary Constitution”? Response to Gary Lawson & Guy I. Seidman, By Any Other Name: Rational Basis Inquiry and the Federal Government’s Fiduciary Duty of Care In By Any Other Name: Rational Basis Inquiry and the Federal Government’s Fiduciary Duty of Care, Professors Gary Lawson and Guy […]
Fla. L. Rev. Forum
Allison Crennen-Dunlap & César Cuauhtémoc García Hernández Pragmatics and Problems Response to Mary Holper, Redefining “Particularly Serious Crimes” in Refugee Law Born of an international commitment to avoid sending migrants to countries where they face persecution on a small set of protected bases, asylum law is one aspect of U.S. immigration law that purports to serve humanitarian […]
Fla. L. Rev. Forum
Ediberto Roman The Tortious Second Amendment: A Response to Andrew McClurg’s The Right to Be Negligent Response to Andrew Jay McClurg, The Second Amendment Right to Be Negligent In his recent provocative article addressing gun violence and the negligence of gun owners and gun sellers, Professor Andrew McClurg asserts the failure of courts and legislatures […]
Fla. L. Rev. Forum
Dmitry Karshtedt Divided Infringement, Economics, and the Common Law Response to W. Keith Robinson, Economic Theory, Divided Infringement, and Enforcing Interactive Patents This essay responds to and builds on Economic Theory, Divided Infringement, and Enforcing Interactive Patents, an article published by Professor Keith Robinson. In his article, Professor Robinson analyzed liability under various tests courts have developed […]