Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Category Archives: Family Law
Ben “Ziggy” Williamson, The Gunslinger to the Ivory Tower Came: Should Universities Have a Duty to Prevent Rampage Killings?
60 Fla. L. Rev. 895 (2008) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: On April 16, 2007, Seung Hui Cho, a Virginia Tech student, went on a rampage across the university’s campus. He murdered thirty- two people-twenty-seven students and five professors-before … Continue reading
Posted in Education Law, Family Law, Tort Law, Uncategorized
Tagged Duty, Gunslinger, Ivory Tower, rampage Killings, Right to Bear Arms, Second Amendment, Seung Hui Cho, Students, Tarasoff, Texas Sniper, Virginia Tech, Virginia Tech Review Panel, Williamson
Comments Off
Mary-Rose Papandrea, Student Speech Rights in the Digital Age
60 Fla. L. Rev. 1027 (2008) | | | | ABSTRACT :: For several decades courts have struggled to determine when, if ever, public schools should have the power to restrict student expression that does not occur on school grounds … Continue reading
Alan E. Garfield, Protecting Children from Speech
57 Fla. L. Rev. 565 (2005) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: The notion that children need to be sheltered from inappropriate speech long predates Janet Jackson’s “wardrobe malfunction” or Bono’s expletive-enhanced acceptance of a Golden Globe. Plato expressed concern … Continue reading
Posted in Computer & Internet Law, Constitutional Law, Family Law, First Amendment, Governments and Legislation, Jurisprudence, Uncategorized
Tagged access to speech, Child Online Protection Act, child-protection censorship, Children, Childrens Internet Protection Act, Columbine High School, Federal Communications Commission, freespeech, functional standard, Garfield, Ginsberg v. New york, girlie magazines, Golden Globe, governmental intervention, Heath High School, howard stern, inappropriate speach, Janet Jackson, Jurisprudence, justification, legislation, McCarthy-type witch hunt, Michael Powell, minors, moral decay, Plato, premodern times, protection, sheltering, substantive question, Technology, Television Programming, United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, v-chips, Video Games, wardrobe malfunction
Comments Off



