-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Category Archives: Estates & Trusts Law
Lydia Pallas Loren, Renegotiating the Copyright Deal in the Shadow of the “Inalienable” Right to Terminate
62 Fla. L. Rev. 1329 (2010)| | | | ABSTRACT :: Few people realize that many contracts that purport to transfer “all right, title and interest” in a copyright can be terminated by the author of the copyrighted work after … Continue reading
Posted in Civil Procedure, Constitutional Law, Copyright Law, Estates & Trusts Law
Tagged asignees, assignors, authors heirs, commerical exploitation, contingent termination rights, Copyright Deal, creative works, federal copyright policy, Inalienable, licensing, Loren, paternalistic desire, renogiation, right to terminate, thirty five years, Valuation problem
Comments Off
Lindsay Roshkind, Interpreting I.R.C. § 67(e): The Supreme Court’s Attempt to Nail Investment Advisory Fees to the “Floor”
60 Fla. L. Rev. 961 (2008) | | | | TEXT :: In the process of statutory interpretation, a court must determine “whether the language at issue has a plain and unambiguous meaning with regard to the particular dispute in … Continue reading
Posted in Estates & Trusts Law, Governments and Legislation, Securities Law, Uncategorized
Tagged 63, 67(e), Advisory Fees, fiduciary duty, I.R.C., institutional investment management, Internal Revenue Code, internal revenue service, IRS, Nail Investment, Roshkind, tax deficiency, trust
Comments Off
Dustin G. Hall, Constitutional Law: What to Do When a State Fails to Take Notice that its Notice has Failed?
59 Fla. L. Rev. 453 (2007) | | | | TEXT :: After Petitioner paid off his mortgage, his annual property taxes went unpaid. Respondent, Commissioner of State Lands, subsequently certified Petitioner’s property as delinquent. Under the applicable state statute, … Continue reading
Posted in Constitutional Law, Criminal Law, Criminal Procedure, Estates & Trusts Law, Property Law, Securities Law, Uncategorized
Tagged Civil Procedure, constitutional law, Creditors, debt collection, Due Process, fourteenth Amendment, Hall, Inefficient Notice, Interested parties, Mennonite Board of Missions v. Adams, Mortgagee, Mullane, Mullane v. Central Hannover Bank & Trust Co., State Notice, state's interest, Summary Judgment
Comments Off