-
Stay Connected:
Sign up for the Florida Law Review Mailing List
eReader Ready:
Current Issue
Jan. 2013, Vol. 65, No. 1
Articles
David Haddock, Tonja Jacobi, & Matthew Sag, League Structure &Stadium Rent Seeking— the Role of Antitrust Revisited
Steven J. Cleveland, Resurrecting Deference to the Securities and Exchange Commission: Mark Cuban Trading on Inside information
Janai S. Nelson, The First Amendment, Equal Protection and Felon Disenfranchisement: A New Viewpoint
Sergio J. Campos, Erie as a Choice of Enforcement Defaults
Hanah Metchis Volokh, Constitutional Authority Statements in Congress
Sapna Kumar, The Accidental Agency?
Christian Turner, State Action Problems
Category Archives: Attorney Practice
Honorable William H. Pryor Jr., The Perspective of a Junior Circuit Judge on Judicial Modesty
60 Fla. L. Rev. 1007 (2008) | | | | TEXT :: I appreciate the invitation to deliver the Dunwody Lecture this year, and I am grateful that this occasion has allowed me to visit, for the first time, one … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Governments and Legislation, Judicial Systems, Trade Law, Uncategorized
Tagged appointment, Cushing, Dunwody, federal judiciary, federalism, judicial modesty, kings bench, Marshall, Pryor, Roberts, role of judiciary, Senator Stevens Thomson Mason, Small r- republicans, Thomas Jefferson
Comments Off
Stephanie L. Varela, Damned If You Do, Doomed If You Don’t: Patenting Legal Methods and its Effect on Lawyers’ Professional Responsibilities
60 Fla. L. Rev. 1145 (2008) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Imagine, before advising each client, having to confer with the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) to determine whether another lawyer already owns a patent to the legal … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Patent Law
Tagged client, envelope of patentable subject matter, federal courts, Grantor retained anuity trusts, GRATs, innovative legal methods, lawyer-client relationship, Lawyers, Legal Methods, legal strategy, Patent, Professional Responsibilities, tax strategy patent, U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, USPTO, Varela
Comments Off
Adam C. Losey, Clicking Away Confidentiality: Workplace Waiver of Attorney-Client Privilege
60 Fla. L. Rev. 1179 (2008) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: Barbara Hall, an administrative assistant, often arrives at work an hour and a half early solely to check her personal e-mails on her employer’s computer. Afterwards, “[i]n the … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Computer & Internet Law, Employment Law, Evidence, Uncategorized
Tagged Attorney Client Privalege, Confidentiality, confidientiality, E-mails, Employer computer monitering, employment, Internet use, litigation, Losey, personal use of electronic communication, Workplace Waiver
Comments Off
Christopher R. Leslie, The Significance of Silence: Collective Action Problems and Class Action Settlements
59 Fla. L. Rev. 71 (2007) | | | | INTRODUCTION :: When the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure first provided for a class action vehicle, hopes were high that individuals would be able to act collectively to hold corporations … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Business & Corporate Law, Civil Procedure, Uncategorized
Tagged aggregation of claims, Civil Procedure, Class ACtion Lawsuits, Collective Action, collusion, Federal Rules, individual compensation, Leslie, settlement, Silence
Comments Off
Diana L. Hayes, Bankruptcy Law: An Exercise in Statutory Interpretation-Staying True to the Broad Aim of the Code or Ignoring Plain Meaning and Purpose?
59 Fla. L. Rev. 697 (2007) | | | | TEXT :: State law required Petitioner to maintain workers’ compensation coverage for his freight trucking business. Petitioner contracted with Respondent to provide this insurance. After Petitioner canceled the policy and … Continue reading
Posted in Attorney Practice, Bankruptcy, Uncategorized, Workers Compensation Law
Tagged 506(a)(5), 506(b), 507(a)(5) Chapter 11, Bankruptcy, Bankruptcy Act, Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals, Hayes, Oversecured, postpetition interest, priority, Shedd, statute, statutory intrepretation, substitution-type benefits, United States v. Embassy Restaurant
Comments Off