74 Fla. L. Rev. 607 (2022)
View the article via pdf

Categories

Abstract

Non-fungible tokens—or NFTs, as they are better known—have taken the world by storm. The idea behind an NFT is that by owning a certain thing (specifically, a digital token that is tracked on a blockchain), one can hold property rights in something else (either a real or an intangible asset). In the early part of 2021, NFTs for items ranging from a GIF of a pop-tart cat with a rainbow tail, to former Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey’s first tweet, to a New York Times column (about NFTs!) have sold for millions of dollars over the internet. Promoters assert that NFTs are the “future of digital property,” and that they herald a day when “government will lose its unique power to mint currency and protect property.” And these promoters reach beyond the typical crypto crowd. Giants of finance and industry are promising to extend the use of NFTs to securities, industrial assets, and real estate in the coming years. Moreover, this crypto token craze comes at a time when the American Law Institute and the Uniform Law Commission are in the midst of recommending revisions to U.S. commercial law to accommodate the digital age. This Article takes a more sober look at the tokenization phenomenon and, in doing so, describes what exactly it means when it comes to property rights. What can a purchaser of a token expect? How is a token actually connected to the underlying asset, if at all? What does the law—not the hype—have to say about it? This Article shows that tokenization under the law actually has a long history, one backed by practical economic considerations and animated by strong theoretical underpinnings. This Article also shows that NFTs have neither of these attributes. Additionally, this Article surveys a dataset of terms of service from the most prominent NFT platforms to explore both their disconnect from real legal effects and their puzzlingly contradictory promises about the relationships between buyers, sellers, and the platforms. This project aims not only to inform current commercial law reform efforts, but also to offer a policy prescription for policing the NFT market.