TEXT :: William Eskridge’s Body Politics: Lawrence v. Texas and the Constitution of Disgust and Contagion is an unusually rhetorical piece. At times it appears that Eskridge thinks that if he characterizes his opponents’ position as one of “disgust” and fear of “contagion” often enough (by my count, 142 and 58 times, respectively), that will make it so. On numerous occasions, he goes beyond the pale of responsible scholarship, in my opinion, not only characterizing his opponents’ position himself (from an external standpoint), but also formulating their own position in those terms, and doing so utterly without justification.
Of course, articles can be highly rhetorical and still have keen analysis. Unfortunately, we have to wait a long time to get around to any serious constitutional argument by Professor Eskridge in his article, and in the end, that argument is not particularly satisfactory.
September 2016, Vol. 68, No. 5
Leslie C. Levin, Lawyers Going Bare and Clients Going Blind
Aya Gruber, Amy J. Cohen, & Kate Mogulescu, Penal Welfare and the New Human Trafficking Intervention Courts
Caprice Roberts, Supreme Disgorgement
Anthony Jose Sirven, Undue Process: A Father's Proprietary Interest in an Embryo and Its Clash with Casey
Maris Snell, Section 875C: Not for All Intents and Purposes