Articles by Category

Civil Procedure



Civil Rights Law



Constitutional Law



Criminal Procedure



Governments and Legislation



For More Articles by Category:

Select a category from the dropdown below or browse our Full Listing of Categories page.



Fla. L. Rev. News

Fla. L. Rev. Forum

Michael Kagan
Shrinking the Post-Plenary Power Problem
Response to Matthew J. Lindsay, Disaggregating “Immigration Law”

Professor Matthew J. Lindsay’s excellent article Disaggregating “Immigration Law” arrives at a pivotal moment in the evolution of American immigration law. My understanding of this moment is thus: A majority of Supreme Court justices appear to be at least occasionally uneasy with the plenary power doctrine that has shaped immigration law since the Chinese Exclusion Case, but they are not all sure how to live without it either. So long as this remains the case, the Court’s immigration jurisprudence is likely to be incrementally favorable to immigrants on the whole, but tentative, inconsistent, and incoherent in some important ways. In my view, the importance of Professor Lindsay’s intervention is that it helps point a way to find clarity in this transitional period. Read more.





Fla. L. Rev. Forum

Glenn Harlan Reynolds
Permissible Negligence and Campaigns to Suppress Rights
Response to Andrew Jay McClurg, The Second Amendment Right to Be Negligent

Professor Andrew McClurg has written interestingly about what he calls the “Second Amendment right to be negligent,” under which, he says, gun owners, sellers, and manufacturers escape liability for guns that, through theft and other means, fall into the hands of criminals, chiefly thanks to a federal statute, the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act. In passing, Professor McClurg notes that only one other item in the Bill of Rights, press freedom under the Supreme Court’s decision in New York Times v. Sullivan, enjoys a similar “right to be negligent.” He is right that other Bill of Rights provisions enjoy no such additional protection (though one might argue that under the Fourth and Fifth Amendments the government enjoys a “right to be negligent” via the doctrine of good-faith immunity). But Professor McClurg’s article understandably does not digress into the interesting question of why, exactly, the First and Second Amendments provide protection against tort claims in a way that other constitutional rights have not. In this brief response, I will look at that question, and will also touch, briefly, on the to-me interesting aspect that the protection enjoyed by publishers under the First Amendment was created by judicial action, while that enjoyed under the Second Amendment was instead the product of legislation. Read more.



Environmental Law



Florida Constitutional Law